BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33262022)

  • 1. Does Blood Transfusion Have an Effect on Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery?
    Bayliss CD; Maier R; Kasim A; Hancock H; Akowuah E
    Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Jun; 30(6):909-916. PubMed ID: 33262022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manubrium-limited ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (MAVRIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Akowuah E; Goodwin AT; Owens WA; Hancock HC; Maier R; Kasim A; Mellor A; Khan K; Murphy G; Mason J
    Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 28129780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Rodríguez-Caulo EA; Guijarro-Contreras A; Otero-Forero J; Mataró MJ; Sánchez-Espín G; Guzón A; Porras C; Such M; Ordóñez A; Melero-Tejedor JM; Jiménez-Navarro M
    Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29454380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcomes of mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.
    Telyuk P; Hancock H; Maier R; Batty JA; Goodwin A; Owens WA; Ogundimu E; Akowuah E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Dec; 63(1):. PubMed ID: 36394261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomised controlled trial.
    Hancock HC; Maier RH; Kasim A; Mason J; Murphy G; Goodwin A; Owens WA; Akowuah E
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e041398. PubMed ID: 33514577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
    Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
    Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.
    Onorati F; D'Errigo P; Grossi C; Barbanti M; Ranucci M; Covello DR; Rosato S; Maraschini A; Santoro G; Tamburino C; Seccareccia F; Santini F; Menicanti L;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 24263007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
    Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
    Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
    Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Abjigitova D; Veen KM; Mokhles MM; Bekkers JA; Oei FB; Bogers AJ
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2021 Jun; 62(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 33302611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
    Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.
    Abdelgawad AME; Hussein MA; Naeim H; Abuelatta R; Alghamdy S
    Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Aug; 22(5):E331-E339. PubMed ID: 31596707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.
    Furukawa N; Kuss O; Aboud A; Schönbrodt M; Renner A; Hakim Meibodi K; Becker T; Zittermann A; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 24446478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.
    Glauber M; Miceli A; Gilmanov D; Ferrarini M; Bevilacqua S; Farneti PA; Solinas M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 May; 145(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22516391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endocarditis is not an Independent Predictor of Blood Transfusion in Aortic Valve Replacement Patients With Severe Aortic Regurgitation.
    Dahn H; Buth K; Legare JF; Mingo H; Kent B; Whynot S; Scheffler M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):687-91. PubMed ID: 26750645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
    Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.