134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33263202)
1. Confidence intervals for difference in proportions for matched pairs compatible with exact McNemar's or sign tests.
Fay MP; Lumbard K
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1147-1159. PubMed ID: 33263202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
Berger RL; Sidik K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals that match Fisher's exact or Blaker's exact tests.
Fay MP
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):373-4. PubMed ID: 19948745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing screening tests: extensions of McNemar's test.
Lachenbruch PA; Lynch CJ
Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2207-17. PubMed ID: 9802179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exact inference for fixed-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
Hansen S; Rice K
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Mar; 13(2):204-213. PubMed ID: 34536267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design.
Tango T
Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):891-908. PubMed ID: 9595618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence intervals for differences in correlated binary proportions.
May WL; Johnson WD
Stat Med; 1997 Sep; 16(18):2127-36. PubMed ID: 9308137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite sample pointwise confidence intervals for a survival distribution with right-censored data.
Fay MP; Brittain EH
Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(16):2726-40. PubMed ID: 26891706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
Maruo K; Kawai N
Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional.
Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():91. PubMed ID: 23848987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing with discreteness: making 'exact' confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact.
Agresti A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Jan; 12(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 12617505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome.
Shan G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32242483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
May WL; Johnson WD
J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions.
Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3369-84. PubMed ID: 17315269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new exact and more powerful unconditional test of no treatment effect from binary matched pairs.
Lloyd CJ
Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):716-723. PubMed ID: 18047530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
Cheng Y; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
