These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33263206)

  • 41. Midwives' respect and disrespect of women during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania: a qualitative study.
    Shimoda K; Horiuchi S; Leshabari S; Shimpuku Y
    Reprod Health; 2018 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 29321051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What determines quality in maternity care? Comparing the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives.
    Proctor S
    Birth; 1998 Jun; 25(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9668742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Midwives experiences of removal of a newborn baby in New South Wales, Australia: Being in the 'head' and 'heart' space.
    Everitt L; Fenwick J; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25681224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study.
    Lohmann S; Mattern E; Ayerle GM
    Midwifery; 2018 Jun; 61():53-62. PubMed ID: 29529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women's responses to care.
    McCourt C; Page L; Hewison J; Vail A
    Birth; 1998 Jun; 25(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 9668740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians.
    Foureur M; Turkmani S; Clack DC; Davis DL; Mollart L; Leiser B; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 27318563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 'What women want': Using image theory to develop expectations of maternity care framework.
    Clark K; Beatty S; Reibel T
    Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 25631551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Midwifery continuity: The use of social media.
    McCarthy R; Choucri L; Ormandy P; Brettle A
    Midwifery; 2017 Sep; 52():34-41. PubMed ID: 28577422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Midwives' perceptions of women's mobile phone use and impact on care in birth suite.
    Lewis L; Barnes C; Allan J; Roberts L; Lube D; Hauck YL
    Midwifery; 2019 Sep; 76():142-147. PubMed ID: 31207448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Midwifery workplace culture in Australia: A national survey of midwives.
    Catling C; Rossiter C
    Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):464-472. PubMed ID: 31676324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Persistent barriers to care; a qualitative study to understand women's experiences in areas served by the midwives service scheme in Nigeria.
    Exley J; Pitchforth E; Okeke E; Glick P; Abubakar IS; Chari A; Bashir U; Gu K; Onwujekwe O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():232. PubMed ID: 27538806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives.
    Todd CJ; Farquhar MC; Camilleri-Ferrante C
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 10076316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Saving lives with caring assessments: How Tanzanian nurse-midwives and obstetricians negotiate postpartum practices.
    Kohi TW; Aston M; Mselle LT; Macdonald D; Mbekenga C; Murphy GT; White M; OHearn S; Price S; Jefferies K
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Dec; 26(23-24):5004-5015. PubMed ID: 28793365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The mentoring experiences of new graduate midwives working in midwifery continuity of care models in Australia.
    Cummins AM; Denney-Wilson E; Homer CSE
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2017 May; 24():106-111. PubMed ID: 26830916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Antenatal care for Somali-born women in Sweden: Perspectives from mothers, fathers and midwives.
    Ahrne M; Schytt E; Andersson E; Small R; Adan A; Essén B; Byrskog U
    Midwifery; 2019 Jul; 74():107-115. PubMed ID: 30953966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Addressing a need. Holistic midwifery in the Netherlands: A qualitative analysis.
    Hollander M; de Miranda E; Vandenbussche F; van Dillen J; Holten L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220489. PubMed ID: 31361787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is experienced by couples in Denmark.
    Jepsen I; Mark E; Foureur M; Nøhr EA; Sørensen EE
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):e61-e69. PubMed ID: 27665216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Graduating midwifery students' preferred model of practice and first job decisions: A qualitative study.
    Kuliukas L; Bayes S; Geraghty S; Bradfield Z; Davison C
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 32814673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Beyond birth: Women's concerns about post-birth care in an Australian urban community.
    Woodward BM; Zadoroznyj M; Benoit C
    Women Birth; 2016 Apr; 29(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 26522960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Midwives' perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women.
    Menke J; Fenwick J; Gamble J; Brittain H; Creedy DK
    Midwifery; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1096-103. PubMed ID: 24462188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.