344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33263401)
1. Benchmarking Force Field and the ANI Neural Network Potentials for the Torsional Potential Energy Surface of Biaryl Drug Fragments.
Lahey SJ; Thien Phuc TN; Rowley CN
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6258-6268. PubMed ID: 33263401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing ANI-2x, ANI-1ccx neural networks, force field, and DFT methods for predicting conformational potential energy of organic molecules.
Rezaee M; Ekrami S; Hashemianzadeh SM
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11791. PubMed ID: 38783010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conformational energies of reference organic molecules: benchmarking of common efficient computational methods against coupled cluster theory.
Stylianakis I; Zervos N; Lii JH; Pantazis DA; Kolocouris A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Dec; 37(12):607-656. PubMed ID: 37597063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.
Fan S; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):543-560. PubMed ID: 31960254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and Evaluation of Geometry Optimization Algorithms in Conjunction with ANI Potentials.
Hao D; He X; Roitberg AE; Zhang S; Wang J
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Feb; 18(2):978-991. PubMed ID: 35020396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of nine condensed-phase force fields of the GROMOS, CHARMM, OPLS, AMBER, and OpenFF families against experimental cross-solvation free energies.
Kashefolgheta S; Wang S; Acree WE; Hünenberger PH
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jun; 23(23):13055-13074. PubMed ID: 34105547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.
Shivakumar D; Williams J; Wu Y; Damm W; Shelley J; Sherman W
J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 May; 6(5):1509-19. PubMed ID: 26615687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polarizable Force Field with a σ-Hole for Liquid and Aqueous Bromomethane.
Adluri AN; Murphy JN; Tozer T; Rowley CN
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Oct; 119(42):13422-32. PubMed ID: 26419599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Benchmarking of Open Force Field 2.0.0: The Sage Small Molecule Force Field.
Boothroyd S; Behara PK; Madin OC; Hahn DF; Jang H; Gapsys V; Wagner JR; Horton JT; Dotson DL; Thompson MW; Maat J; Gokey T; Wang LP; Cole DJ; Gilson MK; Chodera JD; Bayly CI; Shirts MR; Mobley DL
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(11):3251-3275. PubMed ID: 37167319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating protein-ligand binding with neural network potentials.
Lahey SJ; Rowley CN
Chem Sci; 2020 Jan; 11(9):2362-2368. PubMed ID: 34084397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Torsional Energy Barriers of Biaryls Could Be Predicted by Electron Richness/Deficiency of Aromatic Rings; Advancement of Molecular Mechanics toward Atom-Type Independence.
Wei W; Champion C; Liu Z; Barigye SJ; Labute P; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4764-4777. PubMed ID: 31430147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining Force Fields and Neural Networks for an Accurate Representation of Bonded Interactions.
Kamath G; Illarionov A; Sakipov S; Pereyaslavets L; Kurnikov IV; Butin O; Voronina E; Ivahnenko I; Leontyev I; Nawrocki G; Darkhovskiy M; Olevanov M; Cherniavskyi YK; Lock C; Greenslade S; Chen Y; Kornberg RD; Levitt M; Fain B
J Phys Chem A; 2024 Feb; 128(4):807-812. PubMed ID: 38232765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmark study on deep neural network potentials for small organic molecules.
Modee R; Laghuvarapu S; Priyakumar UD
J Comput Chem; 2022 Feb; 43(5):308-318. PubMed ID: 34870332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of the ABEEMσπ Polarization Force Field for Base Pairs with Amino Acid Residue Complexes.
Liu C; Li Y; Han BY; Gong LD; Lu LN; Yang ZZ; Zhao DX
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2098-2111. PubMed ID: 28402659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binding Thermodynamics and Interaction Patterns of Inhibitor-Major Urinary Protein-I Binding from Extensive Free-Energy Calculations: Benchmarking AMBER Force Fields.
Huai Z; Shen Z; Sun Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):284-297. PubMed ID: 33307679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of binding mechanism of triclosan towards cancer markers using molecular docking and molecular dynamics.
Bhardwaj P; Biswas GP; Mahata N; Ghanta S; Bhunia B
Chemosphere; 2022 Apr; 293():133550. PubMed ID: 34999105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Torsion angle preference and energetics of small-molecule ligands bound to proteins.
Hao MH; Haq O; Muegge I
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2242-52. PubMed ID: 17880058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: Accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential and the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model.
de Bakker PI; DePristo MA; Burke DF; Blundell TL
Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 12596261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.
He X; Man VH; Yang W; Lee TS; Wang J
J Chem Phys; 2020 Sep; 153(11):114502. PubMed ID: 32962378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the Limits of the Generalized CHARMM and AMBER Force Fields through Predictions of Hydration Free Energy of Small Molecules.
Chakravorty A; Hussain A; Cervantes LF; Lai TT; Brooks CL
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(10):4089-4101. PubMed ID: 38717640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]