These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33264741)
1. Amplitude based segmentation of ultrasound echoes for attenuation coefficient estimation. Civale J; Bamber J; Harris E Ultrasonics; 2021 Mar; 111():106302. PubMed ID: 33264741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints. Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter. Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation. Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners. Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat. Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo breast tissue backscatter measurements with 7.5- and 10-MHz transducers. Anderson ME; Soo MS; Trahey GE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11295273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation. Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array. Huang SW; Li PC IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):2011-22. PubMed ID: 16422413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners. Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artifact reduction of ultrasound Nakagami imaging by combining multifocus image reconstruction and the noise-assisted correlation algorithm. Tsui PH; Tsai YW Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 24626567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A parametric imaging approach for the segmentation of ultrasound data. Davignon F; Deprez JF; Basset O Ultrasonics; 2005 Dec; 43(10):789-801. PubMed ID: 16054666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging. Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation. Kim H; Varghese T IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):510-9. PubMed ID: 17375820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the precision of spectral backscatter measurements on the estimation of scatterers size in cancellous bone. Padilla F; Jenson F; Laugier P Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e57-60. PubMed ID: 16904147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved parameter estimates based on the homodyned K distribution. Hruska DP; Oelze ML IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2471-81. PubMed ID: 19942533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound backscatter and attenuation in human liver with diffuse disease. Lu ZF; Zagzebski JA; Lee FT Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1047-54. PubMed ID: 10574336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images. Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation. Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations. Liu W; Zagzebski JA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]