154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33265293)
1. Global Reliability Sensitivity Analysis Based on Maximum Entropy and 2-Layer Polynomial Chaos Expansion.
Zhao J; Zeng S; Guo J; Du S
Entropy (Basel); 2018 Mar; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 33265293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polynomial chaos expansion based sensitivity analysis of predicted knee reactions-assessing the influence of the primary ligaments in distraction based models.
Hafez MA; Halloran JP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023; 26(14):1678-1690. PubMed ID: 36222456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics.
Schäfer F; Schiavazzi DE; Hellevik LR; Sturdy J
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; ():e3836. PubMed ID: 38837871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust motion trajectory optimization of overhead cranes based on polynomial chaos expansion.
Peng H; Zhao H; Wang X; Li Y
ISA Trans; 2021 Apr; 110():71-85. PubMed ID: 33745509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Effective Approach for Reliability-Based Sensitivity Analysis with the Principle of Maximum Entropy and Fractional Moments.
Zhang X; Liu J; Yan Y; Pandey M
Entropy (Basel); 2019 Jul; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33267363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis of queueing models based on polynomial chaos approach.
Ameur L; Bachioua L
Arab J Math; 2021; 10(3):527-542. PubMed ID: 34796091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive design of experiments to fit surrogate Gaussian process regression models allows fast sensitivity analysis of the input waveform for patient-specific 3D CFD models of liver radioembolization.
Bomberna T; Maleux G; Debbaut C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jul; 252():108234. PubMed ID: 38823206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast uncertainty quantification for dynamic flux balance analysis using non-smooth polynomial chaos expansions.
Paulson JA; Martin-Casas M; Mesbah A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007308. PubMed ID: 31469832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gaussian Processes and Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Regression Problem: Linkage via the RKHS and Comparison via the KL Divergence.
Yan L; Duan X; Liu B; Xu J
Entropy (Basel); 2018 Mar; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 33265282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trajectory-based global sensitivity analysis in multiscale models.
Bazyleva V; Garibay VM; Roy D
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13902. PubMed ID: 38886392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of Sobol's Sensitivity Indices under Generalized Linear Models.
Lu R; Wang D; Wang M; Rempala GA
Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2018; 47(21):5163-5195. PubMed ID: 30237653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition.
Xiao S; Lu Z; Wang P
Risk Anal; 2018 Dec; 38(12):2703-2721. PubMed ID: 29975984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global sensitivity analysis of parameters based on sPCE: The case study of a concrete face rockfill dam in northwest China.
Ran L; Yang J; Ma C; Cheng L; Zhou M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290665. PubMed ID: 37651367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.
RodrÃguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-objective reliability-based optimization with stochastic metamodels.
Coelho RF; Bouillard P
Evol Comput; 2011; 19(4):525-60. PubMed ID: 21281119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the polynomial chaos expansion to approximate the homogenised response of the intervertebral disc.
Karajan N; Otto D; Oladyshkin S; Ehlers W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Oct; 13(5):1065-80. PubMed ID: 24553971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
