These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33265293)

  • 61. An efficient and unbiased method for sensitivity analysis of stochastic reaction networks.
    Gupta A; Khammash M
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Dec; 11(101):20140979. PubMed ID: 25354975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Band structure analysis of phononic crystals based on the Chebyshev interval method.
    Lei JR; Xie LX; Liu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3234. PubMed ID: 29195436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Sensitivity analysis for biomedical models.
    Hu Z; Shi P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1870-81. PubMed ID: 20562035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Matrix-Based Sensitivity Assessment of Soil Organic Carbon Storage: A Case Study from the ORCHIDEE-MICT Model.
    Huang Y; Zhu D; Ciais P; Guenet B; Huang Y; Goll DS; Guimberteau M; Jornet-Puig A; Lu X; Luo Y
    J Adv Model Earth Syst; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1790-1808. PubMed ID: 31031883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A New Reliability Analysis Model of the Chegongzhuang Heat-Supplying Tunnel Structure Considering the Coupling of Pipeline Thrust and Thermal Effect.
    Zhang J; He S; Wang D; Liu Y; Yao W; Liu X
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 29401691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A hybrid method on sourceless sensitivity calculation for airborne gamma-ray spectrometer.
    Zhang Q; Guo Y; Xu S; Xiong S; Ge L; Wu H; Gu Y; Zeng G; Lai W
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Jul; 137():68-72. PubMed ID: 29587161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A Squeezed Artificial Neural Network for the Symbolic Network Reliability Functions of Binary-State Networks.
    Yeh WC
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2017 Nov; 28(11):2822-2825. PubMed ID: 27552767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Dynamic optimization of biological networks under parametric uncertainty.
    Nimmegeers P; Telen D; Logist F; Impe JV
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10(1):86. PubMed ID: 27580913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Quality-Achieving Reliability Assessment of Rolling Bearing Based on Bootstrap Maximum Entropy Method and Similarity Method.
    Cheng L; Ma W; Xia X; Wang L
    Sci Prog; 2022; 105(2):368504221102737. PubMed ID: 35686372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.
    Melis A; Clayton RH; Marzo A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 33(12):. PubMed ID: 28337862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Optimization of cell seeding in a 2D bio-scaffold system using computational models.
    Ho N; Chua M; Chui CK
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():98-113. PubMed ID: 28359960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.
    Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Quasi-Monte Carlo based global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in modeling free product migration and recovery from petroleum-contaminated aquifers.
    He L; Huang G; Lu H; Wang S; Xu Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Jun; 219-220():133-40. PubMed ID: 22520074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An Analysis of Polynomial Chaos Approximations for Modeling Single-Fluid-Phase Flow in Porous Medium Systems.
    Rupert CP; Miller CT
    J Comput Phys; 2007 Oct; 226(2):2175-2205. PubMed ID: 18836519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Applying global sensitivity analysis to the modelling of flow and water quality in sewers.
    Gamerith V; Neumann MB; Muschalla D
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4600-11. PubMed ID: 23764609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A tutorial on uncertainty propagation techniques for predictive microbiology models: A critical analysis of state-of-the-art techniques.
    Akkermans S; Nimmegeers P; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 282():1-8. PubMed ID: 29885972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Optimizing human activity patterns using global sensitivity analysis.
    Fairchild G; Hickmann KS; Mniszewski SM; Del Valle SY; Hyman JM
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2014 Dec; 20(4):394-416. PubMed ID: 25580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
    Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Carbon emission analysis and evaluation of industrial departments in China: An improved environmental DEA cross model based on information entropy.
    Han Y; Long C; Geng Z; Zhang K
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 205():298-307. PubMed ID: 29028620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reliability-based EDM process parameter optimization using kriging model and sequential sampling.
    Jun M; Xinyu H; Qian X; Shiyou C; Wenbo Z; Xiaoke L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Aug; 16(6):7421-7432. PubMed ID: 31698620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.