BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33266610)

  • 1. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3339-52. PubMed ID: 22453635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind Noisy Image Quality Assessment Using Sub-Band Kurtosis.
    Deng C; Wang S; Bovik AC; Huang GB; Zhao B
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2020 Mar; 50(3):1146-1156. PubMed ID: 30629529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on the Fusion of Statistical and Perceptual Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2020 Jul; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 34460690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oriented correlation models of distorted natural images with application to natural stereopair quality evaluation.
    Su CC; Cormack LK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 May; 24(5):1685-99. PubMed ID: 25751864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Novel No-Reference Quality Assessment Metric for Stereoscopic Images with Consideration of Comprehensive 3D Quality Information.
    Shen L; Yao Y; Geng X; Fang R; Wu D
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 37448078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unsupervised blind image quality assessment via joint spatial and transform features.
    Yang C; He Q; An P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):10865. PubMed ID: 37407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multifocus watermarking approach based on discrete cosine transform.
    Waheed SR; Alkawaz MH; Rehman A; Almazyad AS; Saba T
    Microsc Res Tech; 2016 May; 79(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 26918523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Dual-Domain Feature Fusion.
    Cui Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Mar; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 33286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transparent composite model for DCT coefficients: design and analysis.
    Yang EH; Yu X; Meng J; Sun C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1303-16. PubMed ID: 24723528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.