These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3326772)

  • 21. Retentive properties of luting cements: an in vitro investigation.
    Dahl BL; Oilo G
    Dent Mater; 1986 Feb; 2(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3519330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fracture resistance of metal- and galvano-ceramic crowns cemented with different luting cements: in vitro comparative study.
    Ghazy MH; Madina MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):610-2. PubMed ID: 17165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Luting cements: a review and comparison.
    Oilo G
    Int Dent J; 1991 Apr; 41(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 2032741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of the retentive capacity of dental cementing agents.
    Omar R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jul; 60(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 3042980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of low-viscosity liners on the retention of three luting materials.
    Pameijer CH; Hultén J; Glantz PO; Randow K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1992; 12(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 1305153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strengths of glass-ionomer and polycarboxylate cements to dentine.
    Hood JA; Childs WA; Evans DF
    N Z Dent J; 1981 Oct; 77(350):141-4. PubMed ID: 7031529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns.
    Groten M; Pröbster L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9206458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of shear strength at the cement-endodontic post interface.
    Maniatopoulos C; Pilliar RM; Smith DC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jun; 59(6):662-9. PubMed ID: 3042961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading.
    Wiskott HW; Nicholls JI; Belser UC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):117-39. PubMed ID: 8639233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Study on adhesive materials for restoration. (8) Effect of powder-liquid ratio and working time on the gap between crown and working model when using glass ionomer cement (author's transl)].
    Irie M; Nakajima H; Onozawa Y; Kawamura K; Nakai H; Hashimoto H
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1979; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 297478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of the retention of preformed crowns using two dental cements.
    Garcia-Godoy F
    J Pedod; 1984; 8(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 6374096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
    Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The flow properties of dental cements.
    Wilson AD; Lewis BG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jul; 14(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 7400193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of preparation finish on retention and fit of complete crowns.
    Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Sep; 56(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 3528457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.