These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33268069)

  • 1. Influence of implant position on the accuracy of intraoral scanning in fully edentulous arches: A systematic review.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Medeiros VR; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 33268069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Sallorenzo A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1009-1016. PubMed ID: 33836855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular arches.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Carvalho Porto de Freitas RF; de Fátima Trindade Pinto Campos M; Soares Paiva Tôrres AC; Bezerra de Medeiros AK; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1310-1317. PubMed ID: 33865563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Chen YW; Kotina E; Natto Z; Kang K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):660-678. PubMed ID: 32613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital verification and correction of digital intraoral scans for fixed implant rehabilitation of edentulous arches: A dental technique.
    Negreiros WM; Chanting Sun T; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 34229898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restoration: A digital scanning and maxillomandibular relationship workflow.
    Ahmed WM; Verhaeghe TV; McCullagh APG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 32171489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A systematic review.
    Wulfman C; Naveau A; Rignon-Bret C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 31757443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Álvarez F; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104122. PubMed ID: 35395345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy.
    Marghalani A; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; El Rafie K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review.
    Carneiro Pereira AL; Souza Curinga MR; Melo Segundo HV; da Fonte Porto Carreiro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 34656307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.
    Albanchez-González MI; Brinkmann JC; Peláez-Rico J; López-Suárez C; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Suárez-García MJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.