These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33269325)

  • 21. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors ≤20 mm: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
    Yin Z; Li J; Yang W; Huang W; Xu D; Lei X; Zhang J
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):928-936. PubMed ID: 36084162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resection depth and layer of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection of intermediate-sized colorectal polyps: A pilot study.
    Nomura H; Tsuji S; Utsunomiya M; Kawasaki A; Tsuji K; Yoshida N; Takemura K; Katayanagi K; Minato H; Doyama H
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Aug; 10(8):E1037-E1044. PubMed ID: 35979030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kamal F; Khan MA; Lee-Smith W; Khan Z; Sharma S; Tombazzi C; Ahmad D; Ismail MK; Howden CW; Binmoeller KF
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1264-E1272. PubMed ID: 33015327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an "Underwater" revolution?
    Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Uedo N; Ishihara R
    DEN Open; 2022 Apr; 2(1):e84. PubMed ID: 35310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
    Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Depth of the cutting plane with underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized study.
    Matsueda K; Takeuchi Y; Kitamura M; Yamashina T; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T; Uedo N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 37(4):741-748. PubMed ID: 34978107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for removing sessile colorectal polyps: a propensity-score matched cohort study.
    Chien HC; Uedo N; Hsieh PH
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1528-E1536. PubMed ID: 31681832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤20mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lv XH; Luo R; Lu Q; Deng K; Yang JL
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jun; 55(6):714-720. PubMed ID: 36195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 'Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal injection and marking' for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors to achieve R0 resection: a single-center case series.
    Hashiguchi K; Yamaguchi N; Shiota J; Akashi T; Ogihara K; Tabuchi M; Kitayama M; Matsushima K; Akazawa Y; Ohnita K; Nakao K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jul; 58(7):813-821. PubMed ID: 36708197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for endoscopic management of gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
    Shimamoto Y; Takeuchi Y; Ishiguro S; Nakatsuka SI; Yunokizaki H; Ezoe Y; Matsuno K; Nakahira H; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Yamamoto S; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Ishikawa H
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6877-6884. PubMed ID: 37311890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor.
    Furukawa M; Mitoro A; Ozutumi T; Fujinaga Y; Nakanishi K; Kitagawa K; Saikawa S; Sato S; Sawada Y; Takaya H; Kaji K; Kawaratani H; Namisaki T; Moriya K; Akahane T; Yamao J; Yoshiji H
    Clin Endosc; 2021 May; 54(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 33596634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection without submucosal injection (UEMR) for large colorectal polyps: A community-based series.
    Barclay RL; Percy DB
    Am J Surg; 2020 Sep; 220(3):693-696. PubMed ID: 32061399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video).
    Kim HG; Thosani N; Banerjee S; Chen A; Friedland S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1094-102. PubMed ID: 25012560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.