These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33269439)

  • 1. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learned spatial suppression is not always proactive.
    Chang S; Dube B; Golomb JD; Leber AB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1031-1041. PubMed ID: 37199949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical Learning of Distractor Suppression Downregulates Prestimulus Neural Excitability in Early Visual Cortex.
    Ferrante O; Zhigalov A; Hickey C; Jensen O
    J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(12):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 36801825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial enhancement due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Zhang Y; Yang Y; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 35426029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based suppression in target search but not in distractor inhibition.
    Jeong J; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jul; 86(5):1-27. PubMed ID: 38839715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.