151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33270059)
1. Early Failure Rate and Associated Risk Factors for Dental Implants Placed With and Without Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.
Atarchi AR; Miley DD; Omran MT; Abdulkareem AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 33270059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The relationships between different surgical approaches for maxillary sinus augmentation and implant failure and complications: a retrospective cohort study].
Hao XH; Ye H; Zhai QK
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Apr; 30(2):214-218. PubMed ID: 34109366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: case series.
Hatano N; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 17716259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of sinus augmentation associated with maxillary posterior implants.
Seong WJ; Barczak M; Jung J; Basu S; Olin PS; Conrad HJ
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):680-8. PubMed ID: 21651386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of cancellous block allograft for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the posterior atrophic maxilla.
Chaushu G; Mardinger O; Calderon S; Moses O; Nissan J
J Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 19254126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months.
Raghoebar GM; Timmenga NM; Reintsema H; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11359486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study.
Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforation on Implant Survival Rate: A Retrospective Study.
de Almeida Ferreira CE; Martinelli CB; Novaes AB; Pignaton TB; Guignone CC; Gonçalves de Almeida AL; Saba-Chujfi E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 28291857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Related Risk Factors for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review.
Leung M; Alghamdi R; Guallart IF; Bergamini M; Yu PY; Froum SJ; Cho SC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(3):e121-e128. PubMed ID: 34076648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
Fermergård R; Astrand P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes and risk factor analysis of dental implants inserted with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 3- to 8-year retrospective study.
Zhang L; Zhou C; Jiang J; Chen X; Wang Y; Xu A; He F
J Clin Periodontol; 2024 May; 51(5):652-664. PubMed ID: 38246602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study.
Taschieri S; Lolato A; Testori T; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 29193558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings.
Cordioli G; Mazzocco C; Schepers E; Brugnolo E; Majzoub Z
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 11359485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective study of implants placed following 1-stage or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique performed on residual bone of <4 mm: Results up to 10 years of follow-up.
Kim HJ; Yea S; Kim KH; Lee YM; Ku Y; Rhyu IC; Seol YJ
J Periodontol; 2020 Feb; 91(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 31372997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Mandibular Canal in Severely Atrophied Posterior Alveolar Bone.
Cruz M; Cruz G; Cruz F; Morales-Vadillo R; Cruz-Pierce S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):412-418. PubMed ID: 29534129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A New Method Using Autogenous Impacted Third Molars for Sinus Augmentation to Enhance Implant Treatment: Case Series with Preliminary Results of an Open, Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Pohl V; Schuh C; Fischer MB; Haas R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):622-30. PubMed ID: 27183071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
