506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33270062)
1. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Load-bearing capacity under fatigue and FEA analysis of simplified ceramic restorations supported by Peek or zirconia polycrystals as foundation substrate for implant purposes.
Soares PM; Cadore-Rodrigues AC; Souto Borges AL; Valandro LF; Pereira GKR; Rippe MP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 123():104760. PubMed ID: 34418777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vs translucent zirconia polycrystals bonded to distinct substrates: Fatigue failure load, number of cycles for failure, survival rates, and stress distribution.
Pereira GKR; Graunke P; Maroli A; Zucuni CP; Prochnow C; Valandro LF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 91():122-130. PubMed ID: 30579109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
Elsayed A; Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS
Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of abutment screw-access hole on the fatigue performance of implant-supported lithium-disilicate luted simplified restorations.
da Rosa LS; Soares PM; Packaeser MG; Chiapinotto GF; Bacchi A; Tribst JPM; Kleverlaan CJ; Pereira GKR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106254. PubMed ID: 38035645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
