148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33270786)
1. Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices.
Rosa N; De Bernardo M; Pepe A; Vitiello L; Marotta G; Imparato R; Capasso L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243370. PubMed ID: 33270786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pentacam vs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness.
De Bernardo M; Borrelli M; Mariniello M; Lanza M; Rosa N
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25240777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of corneal thickness using Pentacam HR versus Nidek CEM-530 specular microscopy.
De Bernardo M; Cornetta P; Marotta G; Salerno G; De Pascale I; Rosa N
J Int Med Res; 2020 Apr; 48(4):300060519892385. PubMed ID: 31878803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Central corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes with three different optical devices.
Lanza M; Paolillo E; Gironi Carnevale UA; Lanza A; Irregolare C; Mele L; Bifani M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Dec; 38(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 26048662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.
Anayol MA; Güler E; Yağci R; Şekeroğlu MA; Ylmazoğlu M; Trhş H; Kulak AE; Ylmazbaş P
Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 24763122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of Pentacam peripheral corneal thickness measurements.
Martin R; Jonuscheit S; Rio-Cristobal A; Doughty MJ
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Dec; 38(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 26072988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measurement of central corneal thickness in myopic eyes with ultrasound and Pentacam scheimpflug system].
He YL; Li XX; Bao YZ; Liu GD; Hu YW
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 42(11):985-8. PubMed ID: 17386135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam Scheimpflug photography and Visante optical coherence tomography].
Huang JH; Ge LN; Wen DZ; Chen SH; Yu Y; Wang QM
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 23866707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of corneal thickness in patients with dry eye disease using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Fujimoto K; Inomata T; Okumura Y; Iwata N; Fujio K; Eguchi A; Nagino K; Shokirova H; Karasawa M; Murakami A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228567. PubMed ID: 32012201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between Pentacam-HR and optical coherence tomographycentral corneal thickness measurements in healthy feline eyes.
Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():105-14. PubMed ID: 27370363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients.
Altay Y; Balta O; Demirok G; Burcu A; Balta OB; Ornek F
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Feb; 42(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 27348734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus.
Meyer JJ; Gokul A; Vellara HR; Prime Z; McGhee CN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 175():122-128. PubMed ID: 27993593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.
Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four different optical devices.
Teberik K; Eski MT; Kaya M; Ankaralı H
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 29022163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology.
Ozyol E; Özyol P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 65(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 28643709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement of post-LASIK corneal power and corneal thickness measurements by pentacam and GALILEI corneal tomography systems.
Hsieh YH; Weng TH; Chou YC; Wu KL; Liang CM; Tai MC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 82(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 30839408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
