These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33270786)
41. Comparison of corneal elevation and pachymetry measurements made by two state of the art corneal tomographers with different measurement principles. Schröder S; Langenbucher A; Schrecker J PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223770. PubMed ID: 31618270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. Park SH; Choi SK; Lee D; Jun EJ; Kim JH Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):978-82. PubMed ID: 22699561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT. Kuerten D; Plange N; Koch EC; Koutsonas A; Walter P; Fuest M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 253(7):1105-9. PubMed ID: 25896108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement using the Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry]. Hao GS; Zeng L; Li YR; Shui D Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 47(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 21426844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Repeatability and agreement of five imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in healthy eyes. Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Rao HL; Dutta D Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 65(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28513492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls. Pillunat KR; Waibel S; Spoerl E; Herber R; Pillunat LE J Glaucoma; 2019 Jun; 28(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 30855412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Peripheral nasal-temporal corneal asymmetry in relation to corneal thickness: a Scheimpflug imaging study. Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Martin R; Río-Cristóbal A; Cruikshank V; Lang S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Jan; 35(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25532545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comprehensive comparison of central corneal thickness measurement. Huang J; Pesudovs K; Yu A; Wright T; Wen D; Li M; Yu Y; Wang Q Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):940-9. PubMed ID: 21602731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Wang X; Wu Q Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 23260258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of keratometric measurements between color light-emitting diode topography and Scheimpflug camera. Cui XH; Yoo YS; An Y; Joo CK BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31027491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white. Almorín-Fernández-Vigo I; Sánchez-Guillén I; Fernández-Vigo JI; Macarro-Merino A; Kudsieh B; Fernández-Vigo C; Fernández-Vigo JA Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 39(9):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 30276510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR. McAlinden C; Khadka J; Pesudovs K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7731-7. PubMed ID: 21810981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Corneal thickness and volume measurements by swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal subjects. Fukuda R; Usui T; Miyai T; Mori Y; Miyata K; Amano S Curr Eye Res; 2013 May; 38(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 23448300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reliability of the corneal thickness measurements with the Pentacam HR imaging system and ultrasound pachymetry. Módis L; Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 21139499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes. Yu A; Zhao W; Savini G; Huang Z; Bao F; Lu W; Wang Q; Huang J J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():767012. PubMed ID: 26697213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices. Karadag R; Unluzeybek M; Cakici O; Kanra AY; Bayramlar H Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27723007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry. Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Topographic paracentral corneal thickness with pentacam and orbscan: effect of acoustic factor. González-Pérez J; González-Méijome JM; Rodríguez Ares MT; Parafita MA Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Nov; 37(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 21983548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Reproducibility of Scheimpflug Tomography Measurements Regarding Corneal Front and Back Surface Power]. Stavridis E; Eppig T; Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Nov; 232(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26575536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative Analysis of Tomographic Indicators Forecasting Decompensation in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. Passaro ML; Airaldi M; Ancona C; Cucco R; Costagliola C; Semeraro F; Romano V Cornea; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38471010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]