BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 332712)

  • 1. Detection of bacteriuria by automated electrical impedance monitoring in a clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Throm R; Specter S; Strauss R; Friedman H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 6(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 332712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid detection of bacterial growth in blood samples by a continuous-monitoring electrical impedance apparatus.
    Specter S; Throm R; Strauss R; Friedman H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Nov; 6(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 336642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated methods for detection of bacteriuria.
    Pezzlo MT
    Am J Med; 1983 Jul; 75(1B):71-8. PubMed ID: 6192716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening.
    Davis JR; Stager CE; Araj GF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jan; 81(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 6362393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the BACTOMETER microbial monitoring system with conventional methods for detection of microorganisms in urine specimens.
    Zafari Y; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 May; 5(5):545-7. PubMed ID: 326809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac.
    Kelly MT; Balfour LC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):677-80. PubMed ID: 7014617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of significant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using flow cytometry.
    Okada H; Sakai Y; Miyazaki S; Arakawa S; Hamaguchi Y; Kamidono S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Aug; 38(8):2870-2. PubMed ID: 10921941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of rapid screening tests in processing urine specimens by conventional culture and the AutoMicrobic system.
    Pfaller MA; Koontz FP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 May; 21(5):783-7. PubMed ID: 3889047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impedimetric screening for bacteriuria.
    Cady P; Dufour SW; Lawless P; Nunke B; Kraeger SJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Mar; 7(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 348719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast and accurate prediction of positive and negative urine cultures by flow cytometry.
    Moshaver B; de Boer F; van Egmond-Kreileman H; Kramer E; Stegeman C; Groeneveld P
    BMC Infect Dis; 2016 May; 16():211. PubMed ID: 27189024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new, semiquantitative screening culture device for urine specimens.
    Ferguson J; Tanner J; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1351-3. PubMed ID: 7615754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an adenosine 5'-triphosphate assay as a screening method to detect significant bacteriuria.
    Alexander DN; Ederer GM; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jan; 3(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 767357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reverse-flow apparatus for enhanced colorimetric detection of bacteriuria.
    Wallis C; Melnick JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):942-4. PubMed ID: 6392325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens.
    Jenkins RD; Hale DC; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Mar; 11(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 6991523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria.
    Smith TK; Hudson AJ; Spencer RC
    J Clin Pathol; 1988 Aug; 41(8):904-9. PubMed ID: 2459164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of bacterial cell concentrations by electrical measurements.
    Wheeler TG; Goldschmidt MC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Jan; 1(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 809465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the API Uriscreen with the Vitek Urine Identification-3 and the leukocyte esterase or nitrite strip as a screening test for bacteriuria.
    Dalton MT; Comeau S; Rainnie B; Lambert K; Forward KR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Feb; 16(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 8467632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of BiesseBioscreen as a new methodology for bacteriuria screening.
    Nicolai E; Garau S; Favalli C; D'Agostini C; Gratton E; Motolese G; Rosato N
    New Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 37(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 25387286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a commercially available semi-automated bioluminescence system for bacteriuria screening.
    McWalter PW; Sharp CA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 6756912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the MS-2 and Lumac systems for the rapid screening of urine specimens.
    Welch WD; Layman MA; Southern PM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 May; 81(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 6372433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.