145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33271359)
1. The influence of implant design on the kinetics of osseointegration and bone anchorage homeostasis.
Liddell RS; Ajami E; Li Y; Bajenova E; Yang Y; Davies JE
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():514-526. PubMed ID: 33271359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative contributions of implant hydrophilicity and nanotopography to implant anchorage in bone at Early Time Points.
Liddell RS; Liu ZM; Mendes VC; Davies JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 31566254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.
Klokkevold PR; Johnson P; Dadgostari S; Caputo A; Davies JE; Nishimura RD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits.
Gotfredsen K; Berglundh T; Lindhe J
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 11359256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Sigmoidal Nature of Bone Anchorage.
Liddell RS; Davies JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 35235618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Surface Nanotopography on Bone Response to Titanium Implant.
Freitas GP; Lopes HB; Martins-Neto EC; de Oliveira PT; Beloti MM; Rosa AL
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 26390195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit.
Klokkevold PR; Nishimura RD; Adachi M; Caputo A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 9555202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is the Best Micro and Macro Dental Implant Topography?
Almas K; Smith S; Kutkut A
Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):447-460. PubMed ID: 31097137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of controlled surface nanotopography on the early biological events of osseointegration.
Karazisis D; Petronis S; Agheli H; Emanuelsson L; Norlindh B; Johansson A; Rasmusson L; Thomsen P; Omar O
Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():559-571. PubMed ID: 28232253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved osseointegration of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V implant with a hierarchical micro/nano surface topography: An in vitro and in vivo study.
Ren B; Wan Y; Liu C; Wang H; Yu M; Zhang X; Huang Y
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jan; 118():111505. PubMed ID: 33255064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Newly Created Meso-, Micro-, and Nano-Scale Rough Titanium Surface Promotes Bone-Implant Integration.
Hasegawa M; Saruta J; Hirota M; Taniyama T; Sugita Y; Kubo K; Ishijima M; Ikeda T; Maeda H; Ogawa T
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 31991761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits.
Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24034600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants.
Sul YT; Kwon DH; Kang BS; Oh SJ; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():8-19. PubMed ID: 22093014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5-year prospective study.
Mertens C; Steveling HG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1354-60. PubMed ID: 21382092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tau (τ): A New Parameter to Assess the Osseointegration Potential of an Implant Surface.
Liddell R; Ajami E; Davies JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):102-112. PubMed ID: 27525520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration].
Nasatzky E; Gultchin J; Schwartz Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):8-19, 98. PubMed ID: 14515625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
