These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33272349)

  • 1. Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Ondé D; Alvarado JM
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Dec; 23():e55. PubMed ID: 33272349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corrected goodness-of-fit test in covariance structure analysis.
    Hayakawa K
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 29771549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multinomial processing tree models: an implementation.
    Hu X
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1999 Nov; 31(4):689-95. PubMed ID: 10633986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.
    Arend MG; Schäfer T
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 30265048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: a Monte Carlo approach.
    Myers ND; Ahn S; Jin Y
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Sep; 82(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 21957699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the performance of level-specific fit indices in multilevel confirmatory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators: A Monte Carlo study.
    Lin JJH; Hsu HY
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4222-4259. PubMed ID: 36417171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
    Ximénez C
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One model to rule them all? Using machine learning algorithms to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis.
    Goretzko D; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):776-786. PubMed ID: 32134315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methodology: VIII. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in emergency medicine research.
    Bryant FB; Yarnold PR; Michelson EA
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 6(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 9928978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting polychoric instrumental variables in confirmatory factor analysis: An alternative specification test and effects of instrumental variables.
    Jin S; Cao C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 29323415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latent variables should remain as such: Evidence from a Monte Carlo study.
    Rdz-Navarro K
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(4):417-442. PubMed ID: 31008695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Parker PD; Nagengast B; Asparouhov T; Muthén B; Dicke T
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):524-545. PubMed ID: 28080078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Target rotation with both factor loadings and factor correlations.
    Zhang G; Hattori M; Trichtinger LA; Wang X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):390-402. PubMed ID: 30299117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A study of the psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of Obsessive Thoughts Checklist (OTC) with confirmatory factor analysis].
    Smári J; Thor Olason D
    Encephale; 2005; 31(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 15959441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of ignoring clustered data structure in confirmatory factor analysis of ordered polytomous items: a simulation study based on PANSS.
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Perez J; Khandaker GM; Böhnke JR; Croudace TJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2016 Sep; 25(3):205-19. PubMed ID: 26096674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Item Misspecification and Dichotomization on Class and Parameter Recovery in LCA of Count Data.
    Macia KS; Wickham RE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):113-145. PubMed ID: 30595072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.