These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33274453)

  • 1. Tactical contingencies in the experimental analysis of reinforcement and operant classes.
    Catania AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jan; 115(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 33274453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pigeons play the percentages: computation of probability in a bird.
    Roberts WA; MacDonald H; Lo KH
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Jul; 21(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 29797110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 20676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The operant reserve: a computer simulation in (accelerated) real time.
    Catania AC
    Behav Processes; 2005 May; 69(2):257-78. PubMed ID: 15845312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Problem of Class Breakdown in Sidman's (1994, 2000) Theory about the Origin of Stimulus Equivalence.
    Alonso-Alvarez B
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2023 Mar; 46(1):217-235. PubMed ID: 37006605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.
    Nevin JA; Jenkins P; Whittaker S; Yarensky P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 7057131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
    Galbicka G; Platt JR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavioral momentum and resistance to extinction across repeated extinction tests.
    Craig AR; Sweeney MM; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):290-309. PubMed ID: 31709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of tokens and primary reinforcers.
    Bonfonte SA; Bourret JC; Lloveras LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1593-1605. PubMed ID: 31930500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.
    Galbicka G; Kautz MA; Jagers T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 8354966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing reproducibility of operant testing through reinforcer standardization: identification of key nutritional constituents determining reward strength in touchscreens.
    Kim EW; Phillips BU; Heath CJ; Cho SY; Kim H; Sreedharan J; Song HT; Lee JE; Bussey TJ; Kim CH; Kim E; Saksida LM
    Mol Brain; 2017 Jul; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 28716096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.
    Wagner K; Neuringer A
    Learn Behav; 2006 May; 34(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 16933797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operant sensation seeking in the mouse.
    Olsen CM; Winder DG
    J Vis Exp; 2010 Nov; (45):. PubMed ID: 21113110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The generality of nicotine as a reinforcer enhancer in rats: effects on responding maintained by primary and conditioned reinforcers and resistance to extinction.
    Raiff BR; Dallery J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 Dec; 201(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 18695928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement.
    Roberts C; Harvey MT; May ME; Valdovinos MG; Patterson TG; Couppis MH; Kennedy CH
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Feb; 93(3):612-21. PubMed ID: 18061218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operant schedule transformations and human behavioral momentum.
    Plaud JJ; Gaither GA; Lawrence JB
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1997 Sep; 28(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 9327296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and modification of a response class via positive and negative reinforcement: a translational approach.
    Mendres AE; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):653-72. PubMed ID: 21541150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative reinforcement of behavioral variability without previous training with positive reinforcement.
    Fonseca-Júnior AR; Hunziker MHL
    Behav Processes; 2023 Jan; 204():104797. PubMed ID: 36460137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.