These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33275086)
1. Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding. Kasperbauer TJ; Schmidt KK; Thomas A; Perkins SM; Schwartz PH AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(2):113-122. PubMed ID: 33275086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual. Garrett SB; Murphy M; Wiley J; Dohan D J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):326-334. PubMed ID: 29037106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research participant understanding and engagement in an institutional, self-consent biobank model. Schmanski A; Roberts E; Coors M; Wicks SJ; Arbet J; Weber R; Crooks K; Barnes KC; Taylor MRG J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):257-267. PubMed ID: 32951257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank. Cervo S; Rovina J; Talamini R; Perin T; Canzonieri V; De Paoli P; Steffan A BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():30. PubMed ID: 23899250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative study of adolescents' understanding of biobanks and their attitudes toward participation, re-contact, and data sharing. Murad AM; Myers MF; Thompson SD; Fisher R; Antommaria AH Am J Med Genet A; 2017 Apr; 173(4):930-937. PubMed ID: 28328120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving biobank consent comprehension: a national randomized survey to assess the effect of a simplified form and review/retest intervention. Beskow LM; Lin L; Dombeck CB; Gao E; Weinfurt KP Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):505-512. PubMed ID: 27735922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review. Eisenhauer ER; Tait AR; Rieh SY; Arslanian-Engoren CM Clin Nurs Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 28745067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed Consent in the Newly Established Biobank. Kinkorová J; Topolčan O; Kučera R Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31623267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks. Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schwartz PH J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):167-176. PubMed ID: 34779299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis. D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collecting Biospecimens and Obtaining Biobank Consent From Patients in an Academic Health Care Setting: Practical and Ethical Considerations. Kasperbauer TJ; Waltz A; Hudson B; Hawryluk B; Moore C; Schmidt K; Schwartz PH Acad Med; 2022 Jan; 97(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34524131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment. Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US. Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Still Rather Hazy at Present": Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent. Barazzetti G; Cavalli S; Benaroyo L; Kaufmann A Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Mar; 21(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 28177781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections. Bossert S; Kahrass H; Heinemeyer U; Prokein J; Strech D BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 29262814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial. Simon CM; Klein DW; Schartz HA Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 25834945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form. Sedig LK; De Loney EH; Bailey SB; Spector-Bagdady K; Ghita B; Krienke LK; Hutchinson R Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jul; 44(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 35802790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants? Beskow LM; Hammack-Aviran CM; Brelsford KM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32414333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]