These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33278696)

  • 1. Guidelines for the use and statistical analysis of the Home Office fingermark grading scheme for comparing fingermark development techniques.
    Hockey D; Dove A; Kent T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110604. PubMed ID: 33278696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The design and implementation of a proficiency test for assessors of fingermark quality, to facilitate collaborative practise in fingermark research.
    Fieldhouse S; Gwinnett C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jul; 56(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 27320394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fingermark visualisation on uncirculated £5 (Bank of England) polymer notes: Initial process comparison studies.
    Downham RP; Brewer ER; King RSP; Luscombe AM; Sears VG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():30-43. PubMed ID: 28292656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of scanning Kelvin probe with SEM/EPMA techniques for fingermark recovery from metallic surfaces.
    Challinger SE; Baikie ID; Flannigan G; Halls S; Laing K; Daly L; Nic Daeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():44-52. PubMed ID: 30138750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proteomics as a new tool to study fingermark ageing in forensics.
    Oonk S; Schuurmans T; Pabst M; de Smet LCPM; de Puit M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16425. PubMed ID: 30401937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the technological readiness of time of Flight-Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry for enhancing fingermark recovery - towards operational deployment.
    Charlton D; Costa C; Trindade GF; Hinder S; Watts JF; Bailey MJ
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jan; 63(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 36631186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Composition of fingermark residue: a qualitative and quantitative review.
    Girod A; Ramotowski R; Weyermann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):10-24. PubMed ID: 22727572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring the chemical changes in fingermark residue over time using synchrotron infrared spectroscopy.
    Boseley RE; Vongsvivut J; Appadoo D; Hackett MJ; Lewis SW
    Analyst; 2022 Feb; 147(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 35174821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metal-Organic Frameworks for fingermark detection - A feasibility study.
    Moret S; Scott E; Barone A; Liang K; Lennard C; Roux C; Spindler X
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():83-93. PubMed ID: 30172095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection.
    Chadwick S; Moret S; Jayashanka N; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():381-389. PubMed ID: 29960948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiating individuals through the chemical composition of their fingermarks.
    Gorka M; Thomas A; Bécue A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 May; 346():111645. PubMed ID: 36996582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the effects of routine fingermark detection techniques on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues on various substrates.
    King S; Benson S; Kelly T; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):257-64. PubMed ID: 24314527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harnessing long-lived visible phosphorescence to eliminate background interference from fingermark images.
    Parmenter RA; Clarke KT; Gee WJ
    Analyst; 2021 Sep; 146(17):5225-5229. PubMed ID: 34350904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fingermark detection based on the in situ growth of luminescent nanoparticles--towards a new generation of multimetal deposition.
    Becue A; Scoundrianos A; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18502068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of corrosive substances on fingermark recovery: A pilot study.
    Masterson A; Bleay S
    Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):617-626. PubMed ID: 34482942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of latent fingermarks by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids.
    Wolstenholme R; Bradshaw R; Clench MR; Francese S
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 Oct; 23(19):3031-9. PubMed ID: 19711300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive control tests for fingermark development reagents.
    Janssen-Bouwmeester R; Bremmer C; Koomen L; Siem-Gorré S; de Puit M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110259. PubMed ID: 32224429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-theoretic reflections on processing a fingermark.
    Gittelson S; Bozza S; Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):e42-7. PubMed ID: 23428350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging of target lipid parameters in fingermark residue using GC/MS: Effects of influence factors and perspectives for dating purposes.
    Girod A; Spyratou A; Holmes D; Weyermann C
    Sci Justice; 2016 May; 56(3):165-180. PubMed ID: 27162015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study into fingermarks at activity level on pillowcases.
    de Ronde A; van Aken M; de Puit M; de Poot C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Feb; 295():113-120. PubMed ID: 30579242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.