135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33279157)
1. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the absolute marginal fit of fixed prostheses made from soft Co-Cr and zirconia.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):289-294. PubMed ID: 33279157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fit Alteration of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Multiple-Unit Prostheses After Ceramic Layering.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):789-794. PubMed ID: 33486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?
Daou EE; Salameh P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Apr; 24(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 38650346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of lamination layer thickness and abutment preparation on the fit of Co-Cr multi-unit prostheses fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vitro study.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):652-657. PubMed ID: 35430049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the Build Orientation Parameter Affect the Fit of Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing?
Daou EE
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):41-47. PubMed ID: 38489219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
