These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33279369)

  • 1. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
    Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
    Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric evaluation of dose shaping by adaptive aperture and its impact on plan quality.
    Silvus A; Haefner J; Altman MB; Zhao T; Perkins S; Zhang T
    Med Dosim; 2024 Spring; 49(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 38087750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans.
    Rana S; Storey M; Manthala Padannayil N; Shamurailatpam DS; Bennouna J; George J; Chang J
    Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):e7-e11. PubMed ID: 33246881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of errors in spot size and spot position in robustly optimized pencil beam scanning proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung plans.
    Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):147-154. PubMed ID: 34101334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
    Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
    Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
    Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
    Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
    Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?
    Yi B; Jatczak J; Deng W; Poirier YP; Yao W; Witek ME; Molitoris JK; Zakhary MJ; Zhang B; Biswal NC; Ferris MJ; Mossahebi S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14186. PubMed ID: 37974385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Plan Robustness Evaluation in Comparing Protons and Photons Plans - An Application on IMPT and IMRT Plans in Skull Base Chordomas.
    Noufal MP; Widesott L; Sharma SD; Righetto R; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M
    J Med Phys; 2020; 45(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 33953495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy planning techniques for prostate cancer in the presence of intrafractional organ deformation.
    Varnava M; Sumida I; Oda M; Kurosu K; Isohashi F; Seo Y; Otani K; Ogawa K
    J Radiat Res; 2021 Mar; 62(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 33341880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Dose Rate Optimization Method to Maximize Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Coverage of Critical Organs at Risk Without Compromising Dosimetry Metrics in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiation Therapy.
    Zhao X; Huang S; Lin H; Choi JI; Zhu K; Simone CB; Yan X; Kang M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Nov; 120(4):1181-1191. PubMed ID: 38879087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
    Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.