These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A case of unilateral Horner's syndrome after combined spinal epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine 10mg/mL for cesarean section. Theodosiadis PD; Grosomanidis VO; Gkoutzioulis FV; Tzafettas JM Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Jan; 15(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 16325391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined spinal epidural causes a higher level of block than equivalent, single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Tayal G; Mittal RK; Katyal S Anesth Analg; 2007 Mar; 104(3):745-6; author reply 746. PubMed ID: 17312244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A case for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for Cesarean section in a patient with aortic stenosis. Boso EB W V Med J; 2008; 104(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 18491795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a retrospective study with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine]. Kasaba T; Tamura R; Iwasaki T; Maruta T; Miura H; Takasaki M Masui; 2004 Aug; 53(8):893-7. PubMed ID: 15446678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Urgent cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in a patient with aortitis syndrome]. Yamaguchi S; Nagao M; Mishio M; Matsumoto T; Okuda Y; Kitajima T Masui; 1998 May; 47(5):566-9. PubMed ID: 9621666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Combined spinal and epidural analgesia for caesarean section]. Shima T; Haga S; Momose K; Andoh K; Koga Y; Hashimoto Y Masui; 1993 Jul; 42(7):979-84. PubMed ID: 8350484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When using spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section after the epidural has failed, the normal dose of spinal anaesthetic should be used. Stocks GM Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Jan; 14(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15627542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When using spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section after the epidural has failed, the normal dose of spinal anaesthetic should be used. Wilson MJ Int J Obstet Anesth; 2005 Jan; 14(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 15627541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Combined spinal epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean section]. Saitoh K; Suzuki H; Igarashi T; Hirabayashi Y; Seo N Masui; 2005 Oct; 54(10):1121-4. PubMed ID: 16231765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia. Berends N; Teunkens A; Vandermeersch E; Van de Velde M Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2005; 56(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16013660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy]. Toda N; Maeda K; Shoji E; Suzuki T; Kitaura M; Nishimoto M Masui; 2008 Feb; 57(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 18277568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultra low dose combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Lim Y; Loo CC; Goh E Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Jul; 13(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15321404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with very low dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine for cesarean section in a preeclamptic patient. Guasch E; Dominguez A; Alsina E; Gilsanz F Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Jan; 16(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 17125994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia: proponent position. Hood DD Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2002; 53(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 12503355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidural volume extension and low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural blockade: two ways to reduce spinal dose requirement for caesarean section. McNaught AF; Stocks GM Int J Obstet Anesth; 2007 Oct; 16(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 17693082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal acid-base state following spinal or epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Caritis SN; Abouleish E; Edelstone DI; Mueller-Heubach E Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 56(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 6776456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]