354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33279813)
41. Performance evaluation of a dual linear ion trap-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer for proteomics research.
Weisbrod CR; Hoopmann MR; Senko MW; Bruce JE
J Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 88():109-19. PubMed ID: 23590889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of NanoLC Column and Gradient Length as well as MS/MS Frequency and Sample Complexity on Shotgun Protein Identification of Marine Bacteria.
Wöhlbrand L; Rabus R; Blasius B; Feenders C
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017; 27(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 28850952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Improving proteome coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap using design of experiments.
Andrews GL; Dean RA; Hawkridge AM; Muddiman DC
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2011 Apr; 22(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 21472614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Systematic comparison of fractionation methods for in-depth analysis of plasma proteomes.
Cao Z; Tang HY; Wang H; Liu Q; Speicher DW
J Proteome Res; 2012 Jun; 11(6):3090-100. PubMed ID: 22536952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluating Chromatographic Approaches for the Quantitative Analysis of a Human Proteome on Orbitrap-Based Mass Spectrometry Systems.
Zhang Y; Wen Z; Washburn MP; Florens L
J Proteome Res; 2019 Apr; 18(4):1857-1869. PubMed ID: 30884231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Increased proteome coverage by combining PAGE and peptide isoelectric focusing: comparative study of gel-based separation approaches.
Atanassov I; Urlaub H
Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 13(20):2947-55. PubMed ID: 23943586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Human follicular fluid proteomic and peptidomic composition quantitative studies by SWATH-MS methodology. Applicability of high pH RP-HPLC fractionation.
Lewandowska AE; Macur K; Czaplewska P; Liss J; Łukaszuk K; Ołdziej S
J Proteomics; 2019 Jan; 191():131-142. PubMed ID: 29530678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A systematic evaluation of yeast sample preparation protocols for spectral identifications, proteome coverage and post-isolation modifications.
den Ridder M; Knibbe E; van den Brandeler W; Daran-Lapujade P; Pabst M
J Proteomics; 2022 Jun; 261():104576. PubMed ID: 35351659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Microscale Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography/Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Deep and Highly Sensitive Bottom-Up Proteomics: Identification of 7500 Proteins with Five Micrograms of an MCF7 Proteome Digest.
Yang Z; Shen X; Chen D; Sun L
Anal Chem; 2018 Sep; 90(17):10479-10486. PubMed ID: 30102516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Multiple solvent elution, a method to counter the effects of coelution and ion suppression in LC-MS analysis in bottom up proteomics.
Budamgunta H; Maes E; Willems H; Menschaert G; Schildermans K; Kumar AA; Boonen K; Baggerman G
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2019 Aug; 1124():256-264. PubMed ID: 31238262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics.
Fang Y; Robinson DP; Foster LJ
J Proteome Res; 2010 Apr; 9(4):1902-12. PubMed ID: 20078137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Critical comparison of multidimensional separation methods for increasing protein expression coverage.
Antberg L; Cifani P; Sandin M; Levander F; James P
J Proteome Res; 2012 May; 11(5):2644-52. PubMed ID: 22449141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. One-hour proteome analysis in yeast.
Richards AL; Hebert AS; Ulbrich A; Bailey DJ; Coughlin EE; Westphall MS; Coon JJ
Nat Protoc; 2015 May; 10(5):701-14. PubMed ID: 25855955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Targeted proteomic quantification on quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Gallien S; Duriez E; Crone C; Kellmann M; Moehring T; Domon B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Dec; 11(12):1709-23. PubMed ID: 22962056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Synergistic optimization of Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry parameters on Orbitrap Tribrid mass spectrometer for high efficient data-dependent proteomics.
Huang P; Liu C; Gao W; Chu B; Cai Z; Tian R
J Mass Spectrom; 2021 Apr; 56(4):e4653. PubMed ID: 32924238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Label-Free Quantitative Analysis of Mitochondrial Proteomes Using the Multienzyme Digestion-Filter Aided Sample Preparation (MED-FASP) and "Total Protein Approach".
Wiśniewski JR
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1567():69-77. PubMed ID: 28276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Perfluorooctanoic acid and ammonium perfluorooctanoate: volatile surfactants for proteome analysis?
Vieira DB; Crowell AM; Doucette AA
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Mar; 26(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 22302492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Coupling a detergent lysis/cleanup methodology with intact protein fractionation for enhanced proteome characterization.
Sharma R; Dill BD; Chourey K; Shah M; VerBerkmoes NC; Hettich RL
J Proteome Res; 2012 Dec; 11(12):6008-18. PubMed ID: 23126408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method.
Wiśniewski JR; Zielinska DF; Mann M
Anal Biochem; 2011 Mar; 410(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 21144814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Reversed-phase liquid chromatography with double gradient elution for the separation and mass spectrometric analysis of peptides].
Ma Y; Zhang W; Wei J; Niu M; Lin H; Qin W; Zhang Y; Qian X
Se Pu; 2011 Mar; 29(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 21657048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
