222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33280609)
1. Psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the observer OPTION
Chen Z; Bai X; Jin G; Tao X; Huang G; Zhao Y
BMC Fam Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(1):263. PubMed ID: 33280609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties of the German version of Observer OPTION
Kölker M; Topp J; Elwyn G; Härter M; Scholl I
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 29386031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R
Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy.
Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M; Elwyn G; Zimmermann C
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 17433603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making.
Barr PJ; O'Malley AJ; Tsulukidze M; Gionfriddo MR; Montori V; Elwyn G
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Aug; 98(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 25956069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Chinese version of OPTION scale: Is it reliable on measuring the shared decision-making among preoperative conversations.
Zhang F; Wang Q; Liu X; Zhang Y; Liu H; Yin M; Zhao Y; Tie B
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Dec; 104(12):3032-3037. PubMed ID: 34183218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Härter M
Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 23176071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).
Cai L; Ahlström G; Tang P; Ma K; Edvardsson D; Behm L; Fu H; Zhang J; Yang J
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017250. PubMed ID: 28851797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale.
Hirsch O; Keller H; Müller-Engelmann M; Gutenbrunner MH; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N
Health Expect; 2012 Dec; 15(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 21521432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing patients' involvement in decision making during the nutritional consultation with a dietitian.
Vaillancourt H; Légaré F; Lapointe A; Deschênes SM; Desroches S
Health Expect; 2014 Aug; 17(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 22512818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OPTION(5) versus OPTION(12) instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making.
Stubenrouch FE; Pieterse AH; Falkenberg R; Santema TK; Stiggelbout AM; van der Weijden T; Aarts JA; Ubbink DT
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jun; 99(6):1062-8. PubMed ID: 26776490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the ability of OPTION(12) and OPTION(5) to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling.
Vortel MA; Adam S; Port-Thompson AV; Friedman JM; Grande SW; Birch PH
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Oct; 99(10):1717-23. PubMed ID: 27085518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study.
Li J; Zhao F; Bai H; Lin P; Shao D; Sun J; Zhang H; Cao F
Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Sep; 97():14-20. PubMed ID: 31129444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient, clinician and independent observer perspectives of shared decision making in adult orthodontics.
Keshtgar A; Cunningham SJ; Jones E; Ryan FS
J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 48(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 33888000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders.
Wang W; Sheng J; Tang Y; Xie Q; Wei M; Li Z; Zheng W
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 May; 21(1):325. PubMed ID: 32450830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Italian version of the Trunk Impairment Scale: development and psychometric properties.
Lombardi B; Orioli A; Casavola D; Paci M
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Aug; 53(4):516-520. PubMed ID: 28382809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.
Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Pieterse AH; Kroonenberg PM; Scholl I; van der Weijden T; Luyten GP; Kruitwagen RF; den Ouden H; Carlier IV; van Vliet IM; Zitman FG; Stiggelbout AM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132158. PubMed ID: 26151946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.
Rencz F; Tamási B; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Weszl M; Péntek M
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 1):43-55. PubMed ID: 31111402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
