157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33282656)
1. A Brief Review for Common Doppler Ultrasound Flow Phantoms.
Shalbi SM; Oglat AA; Albarbar B; Elkut F; Qaeed MA; Arra AA
J Med Ultrasound; 2020; 28(3):138-142. PubMed ID: 33282656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemical Items Used for Preparing Tissue-Mimicking Material of Wall-Less Flow Phantom for Doppler Ultrasound Imaging.
Oglat AA; Matjafri MZ; Suardi N; Oqlat MA; Abdelrahman MA; Oqlat AA; Farhat OF; Alkhateb BN; Abdalrheem R; Ahmad MS; Abujazar MYM
J Med Ultrasound; 2018; 26(3):123-127. PubMed ID: 30283197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Custom-made flow phantoms for quantitative ultrasound microvessel imaging.
Adusei S; Ternifi R; Fatemi M; Alizad A
Ultrasonics; 2023 Sep; 134():107092. PubMed ID: 37364357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms.
Browne JE; Ramnarine KV; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1053-60. PubMed ID: 12878252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound assessment of the conversion of sound energy into heat in tissue phantoms enriched with magnetic micro- and nanoparticles.
Gambin B; Kruglenko E; Tymkiewicz R; Litniewski J
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4361-4370. PubMed ID: 31359439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tuning acoustic and mechanical properties of materials for ultrasound phantoms and smart substrates for cell cultures.
Cafarelli A; Verbeni A; Poliziani A; Dario P; Menciassi A; Ricotti L
Acta Biomater; 2017 Feb; 49():368-378. PubMed ID: 27884775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.
Culjat MO; Goldenberg D; Tewari P; Singh RS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):861-73. PubMed ID: 20510184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Dynamic Ultrasound Phantom with Tissue-Mimicking Mechanical and Acoustic Properties.
Fernandez SV; Kim JH; Sadat D; Marcus C; Suh E; Mclntosh R; Shah A; Dagdeviren C
Adv Sci (Weinh); 2024 Jun; 11(22):e2400271. PubMed ID: 38647427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of a fat tissue mimicking material for high intensity focused ultrasound applications.
Filippou A; Louca I; Damianou C
J Ultrasound; 2023 Jun; 26(2):505-515. PubMed ID: 36414928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A wall-less poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel flow phantom with accurate scattering properties for transcranial Doppler ultrasound propagation channels analysis.
Weir AJ; Sayer R; Cheng-Xiang Wang ; Parks S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2709-12. PubMed ID: 26736851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic impedance measurement of tissue mimicking materials by using scanning acoustic microscopy.
Altun B; Demirkan I; Isik EO; Kocaturk O; Unlu MB; Garipcan B
Ultrasonics; 2021 Feb; 110():106274. PubMed ID: 33130362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construction and geometric stability of physiological flow rate wall-less stenosis phantoms.
Ramnarine KV; Anderson T; Hoskins PR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Feb; 27(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 11316533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attenuation Coefficients of the Individual Components of the International Electrotechnical Commission Agar Tissue-Mimicking Material.
Rabell-Montiel A; Anderson T; Pye SD; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2371-2378. PubMed ID: 30076033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metrological Validation of a Measurement Procedure for the Characterization of a Biological Ultrasound Tissue-Mimicking Material.
Santos TQ; Alvarenga AV; Oliveira DP; Costa-Felix RP
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):323-331. PubMed ID: 27756496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The speed of sound and attenuation of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material for high frequency ultrasound applications.
Sun C; Pye SD; Browne JE; Janeczko A; Ellis B; Butler MB; Sboros V; Thomson AJ; Brewin MP; Earnshaw CH; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1262-70. PubMed ID: 22502881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tissue-Mimicking Material Fabrication and Properties for Multiparametric Ultrasound Phantoms: A Systematic Review.
Jawli A; Aldehani W; Nabi G; Huang Z
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 38927856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel tissue mimicking materials for high frequency breast ultrasound phantoms.
Cannon LM; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):122-35. PubMed ID: 21084158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference characterisation of sound speed and attenuation of the IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material up to a frequency of 60 MHz.
Rajagopal S; Sadhoo N; Zeqiri B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):317-33. PubMed ID: 25220268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of Reference Material Certification for Speed of Sound and Attenuation Coefficient Based on Standard Tissue-Mimicking Material.
Maia TQS; Alvarenga AV; Souza RM; Costa-Félix RPB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1904-1919. PubMed ID: 33896678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
