These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33283416)

  • 21. Custom adaptation of an occlusal plane analyzer to a semiadjustable articulator.
    Toothaker RW; Graves AR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 9922442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of a facebow transfer procedure.
    Bowley JF; Michaels GC; Lai TW; Lin PP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 1507132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison reproducibility between the facebow and a new technique based on a spirit level device.
    Almeida MG; Nassar MSP; Bataglion CAN; De Mello Filho FV; Terreri AL; Bataglion C
    Cranio; 2021 Jul; 39(4):344-350. PubMed ID: 31433268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand?
    Lepidi L; Galli M; Mastrangelo F; Venezia P; Joda T; Wang HL; Li J
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 32827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators.
    Gordon SR; Stoffer WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB; Bannerman RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of occlusal contacts relative to mounting cast variables.
    Peregrina A; Feil PH
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Sep; 25(9):617-9. PubMed ID: 7568714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functional versus aesthetic articulation of maxillary anterior restorations.
    Chiche GJ; Aoshima H
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 9(3):335-42; quiz 343. PubMed ID: 9553505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved digital transfer of the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Mínguez R; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 24836282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S; Dong B; Zhang Q; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts.
    Freilich MA; Altieri JV; Wahle JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 1501191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Split cast discrepancies and arbitrary axis dental cast articulator mounting.
    Laing DP; Wise MD
    J Oral Rehabil; 1978 Jul; 5(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 279651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digitizing the Facebow: A Clinician/Technician Communication Tool.
    Kalman L; Chrapka J; Joseph Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 26757326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical considerations and rationale for the use of simplified instrumentation in occlusal rehabilitation. Part 1: Mounting of the models on the articulator.
    Gracis S
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Feb; 23(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 12617369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An investigation of the ability of computerized axiography to reproduce occlusal contacts.
    Franklin P; McLelland R; Brunton P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20397498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
    Hicks ST; Wood DP
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.