219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33283763)
1. Fast mixed integer optimization (FMIO) for high dose rate brachytherapy.
Antaki M; L Deufel C; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(21):215005. PubMed ID: 33283763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):1041-57. PubMed ID: 23363622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Penalty weight tuning in high dose rate brachytherapy using multi-objective Bayesian optimization.
Jafarzadeh H; Antaki M; Mao X; Duclos M; Maleki F; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38670145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dwell time modulation restrictions do not necessarily improve treatment plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Balvert M; Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 25549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous needle catheter selection and dwell time optimization for preplanning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Wang C; Gonzalez Y; Shen C; Hrycushko B; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(5):055028. PubMed ID: 33264753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying the column generation method to the intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy inverse planning problem.
Antaki M; Renaud MA; Morcos M; Seuntjens J; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(6):. PubMed ID: 36791469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A robust evaluation of 49 high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including all major uncertainties.
Kennedy AC; Douglass MJJ; Santos AMC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14182. PubMed ID: 37837652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sub-second high dose rate brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations with bGPUMCD.
Hissoiny S; D'Amours M; Ozell B; Despres P; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4559-67. PubMed ID: 22830787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impact of a robust optimization approach to mitigate effects from rotational uncertainty in prostate intensity-modulated brachytherapy.
Morén B; Antaki M; Famulari G; Morcos M; Larsson T; Enger SA; Tedgren ÅC
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1029-1043. PubMed ID: 36478226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catheter position prediction using deep-learning-based multi-atlas registration for high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy.
Lei Y; Wang T; Fu Y; Roper J; Jani AB; Liu T; Patel P; Yang X
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7261-7270. PubMed ID: 34480801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization.
Yoshioka Y; Nishimura T; Kamata M; Harada H; Kanazawa K; Fuji H; Murayama S
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jun; 75(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15890425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DVH-Based Inverse Planning Using Monte Carlo Dosimetry for LDR Prostate Brachytherapy.
Mountris KA; Visvikis D; Bert J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Feb; 103(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 30315873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of hybrid inverse planning and optimization (HIPO) algorithm for optimization in real-time, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate.
Pokharel S; Rana S; Blikenstaff J; Sadeghi A; Prestidge B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4198. PubMed ID: 23835384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
