These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33284906)
1. Influence of Abutment Fabrication Method on 3D Fit at the Implant-Abutment Connection. Ramalho I; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bergamo E; Pegoraro LF; Bonfante EA Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):641-647. PubMed ID: 33284906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of misfit and roughness of CAD-CAM ZrO, selective laser sintered CoCr and preformed Ti implant abutment crowns. Vohra F; Alsaif R; Khan R; Bukhari IA BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):999. PubMed ID: 39183312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses. Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision of the Connection Between Implant and Standard or Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Abutments: A Novel Evaluation Method. Lops D; Meneghello R; Sbricoli L; Savio G; Bressan E; Stellini E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 29340342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading. Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique. Cardoso KB; Bergamo ETP; Cruz VM; Ramalho IS; Lino LFO; Bonfante EA J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20200343. PubMed ID: 33263647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection. Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Adaptation of Single-Unit Screw-Retained Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Abutments After Mechanical Cycling. Markarian RA; Galles DP; Gomes França FM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):127–136. PubMed ID: 28632256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of surface micro-roughness and adaptation of titanium and cobalt chrome implant abutment fabricated by selective laser melting and conventional techniques. Albaijan R; Vohra F; Alnassar TM; Robaian A; Alnafaiy SM; Murayshed MS; Alnasser AH; Alshehri A; Gufran K Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39300896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axial displacement in cement-retained prostheses with different implant-abutment connections. Ko KH; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1098–1104. PubMed ID: 30934038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the fit of CAD/CAM abutments. Hamilton A; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Evans C Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 23837169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations. Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique. Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area. Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading. Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants. Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study. Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]