These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33285649)
21. Clinical Prediction Rule for Identifying the Stroke Patients who will Obtain Clinically Important Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function by Robot-Assisted Upper Limb. Iwamoto Y; Imura T; Tanaka R; Mitsutake T; Jung H; Suzukawa T; Taki S; Imada N; Inagawa T; Araki H; Araki O J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2022 Jul; 31(7):106517. PubMed ID: 35500359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Training Versus Enhanced Upper Extremity Therapy on Upper and Lower Extremity for Stroke Survivors: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Lin Y; Li QY; Qu Q; Ding L; Chen Z; Huang F; Hu S; Deng W; Guo F; Wang C; Deng P; Li L; Jin H; Gao C; Shu B; Jia J J Rehabil Med; 2022 Aug; 54():jrm00314. PubMed ID: 35892319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study. Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robot-Assisted Reach Training With an Active Assistant Protocol for Long-Term Upper Extremity Impairment Poststroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cho KH; Song WK Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Feb; 100(2):213-219. PubMed ID: 30686326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb and cognitive function in patients with stroke: study protocol of a randomized controlled study. Wang Y; Ye M; Tong Y; Xiong L; Wu X; Geng C; Zhang W; Dai Z; Tian W; Rong J Trials; 2022 Jun; 23(1):538. PubMed ID: 35765084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of robot assistive upper extremity rehabilitation on motor and cognitive recovery, the quality of life, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Zengin-Metli D; Özbudak-Demir S; Eraktaş İ; Binay-Safer V; Ekiz T J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2018; 31(6):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 29966188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Boosting robot-assisted rehabilitation of stroke hemiparesis by individualized selection of upper limb movements - a pilot study. Rosenthal O; Wing AM; Wyatt JL; Punt D; Brownless B; Ko-Ko C; Miall RC J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 30894192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Kinematic Assessment to Measure Change in Impairment during Active and Active-Assisted Type of Robotic Rehabilitation for Patients with Stroke. Hwang D; Shin JH; Kwon S Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Time course of the upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients undergoing conventional or robotic rehabilitation. A preliminary report. Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Galli C; Cattaneo D; Spedicato A; Aprile I J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(5 Suppl. 3):201-208. Technology in Medicine. PubMed ID: 33386050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke. Meadmore KL; Hughes AM; Freeman CT; Cai Z; Tong D; Burridge JH; Rogers E J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():32. PubMed ID: 22676920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation versus physical therapy on subacute stroke patients: A follow-up study. Franceschini M; Mazzoleni S; Goffredo M; Pournajaf S; Galafate D; Criscuolo S; Agosti M; Posteraro F J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Jan; 24(1):194-198. PubMed ID: 31987544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does assist-as-needed upper limb robotic therapy promote participation in repetitive activity-based motor training in sub-acute stroke patients with severe paresis? Grosmaire AG; Duret C NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28527224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of Dose of Combined Conventional and Robotic Therapy on Upper Limb Motor Impairments and Costs in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Study. Pila O; Koeppel T; Grosmaire AG; Duret C Front Neurol; 2022; 13():770259. PubMed ID: 35222240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of mirror therapy can be improved by simultaneous robotic assistance. Schrader M; Sterr A; Kettlitz R; Wohlmeiner A; Buschfort R; Dohle C; Bamborschke S Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2022; 40(3):185-194. PubMed ID: 35848045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice improves task and motor performance in the upper extremities of chronic stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial. Hsu HY; Chiu HY; Kuan TS; Tsai CL; Su FC; Kuo LC Aust Occup Ther J; 2019 Oct; 66(5):637-647. PubMed ID: 31317553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Positive effects of robotic exoskeleton training of upper limb reaching movements after stroke. Frisoli A; Procopio C; Chisari C; Creatini I; Bonfiglio L; Bergamasco M; Rossi B; Carboncini MC J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():36. PubMed ID: 22681653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of a robotic device for the rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in subacute stroke: exploration of patient/robot interactions and the motor recovery process. Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG; Hutin E Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():482389. PubMed ID: 25821804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]