These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33285835)

  • 41. A Novel Image Quality Assessment With Globally and Locally Consilient Visual Quality Perception.
    Bae SH; Kim M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 May; 25(5):2392-406. PubMed ID: 27046873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Deep Visual Saliency on Stereoscopic Images.
    Nguyen AD; Kim J; Oh H; Kim H; Lin W; Lee S
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 30403631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Yan Q; Gong D; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; 28(5):2200-2211. PubMed ID: 30507506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Waterloo Exploration Database: New Challenges for Image Quality Assessment Models.
    Kede Ma ; Zhengfang Duanmu ; Qingbo Wu ; Zhou Wang ; Hongwei Yong ; Hongliang Li ; Lei Zhang
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):1004-1016. PubMed ID: 27893392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reduced-Reference Quality Assessment Based on the Entropy of DWT Coefficients of Locally Weighted Gradient Magnitudes.
    Golestaneh SA; Karam L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Nov; 25(11):5293-5303. PubMed ID: 28113627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multivariate Statistical Approach to Image Quality Tasks.
    Gupta P; Bampis CG; Glover JL; Paulter NG; Bovik AC
    J Imaging; 2018; 4(10):. PubMed ID: 33043059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index.
    Xue W; Zhang L; Mou X; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):684-95. PubMed ID: 26270911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.
    Rajagopal H; Mokhtar N; Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam TF; Wan Ahmad WK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233320. PubMed ID: 32428043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment with Multi-Scale Orderless Pooling of Deep Features.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2021 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 39080900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Blind Quality Estimation by Disentangling Perceptual and Noisy Features in High Dynamic Range Images.
    Kottayil NK; Valenzise G; Dufaux F; Cheng I
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Mar; 27(3):1512-1525. PubMed ID: 29990064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild.
    Zhang W; Ma K; Zhai G; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():3474-3486. PubMed ID: 33661733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spherical DNNs and Their Applications in 360
    Xu Y; Zhang Z; Gao S
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Oct; 44(10):7235-7252. PubMed ID: 34314354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Deep learning-driven multi-view multi-task image quality assessment method for chest CT image.
    Su J; Li M; Lin Y; Xiong L; Yuan C; Zhou Z; Yan K
    Biomed Eng Online; 2023 Dec; 22(1):117. PubMed ID: 38057850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Human Visual System Inspired No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Method Based on Local Feature Descriptors.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visual Saliency via Embedding Hierarchical Knowledge in a Deep Neural Network.
    Zhou F; Yao R; Liao G; Liu B; Qiu G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Aug; PP():. PubMed ID: 32813655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. ESIM: Edge Similarity for Screen Content Image Quality Assessment.
    Ni Z; Ma L; Zeng H; Chen J; Cai C; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Oct; 26(10):4818-4831. PubMed ID: 28644808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deep CNN-Based Blind Image Quality Predictor.
    Kim J; Nguyen AD; Lee S
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2019 Jan; 30(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 29994270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.