These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33285994)

  • 1. Magnetic Resonance Image Quality Assessment by Using Non-Maximum Suppression and Entropy Analysis.
    Obuchowicz R; Oszust M; Bielecka M; Bielecki A; Piórkowski A
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33285994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning to rank for blind image quality assessment.
    Gao F; Tao D; Gao X; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2275-90. PubMed ID: 25616080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator.
    Lin Zhang ; Lei Zhang ; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Aug; 24(8):2579-91. PubMed ID: 25915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Magnetic Resonance Image Quality Assessment.
    Stępień I; Obuchowicz R; Piórkowski A; Oszust M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33546412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Scenes Based on Entropy Differences in the DCT Domain.
    Yang X; Li F; Zhang W; He L
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs.
    Kede Ma ; Wentao Liu ; Tongliang Liu ; Zhou Wang ; Dacheng Tao
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Aug; 26(8):3951-3964. PubMed ID: 28574353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind quality assessment of authentically distorted images.
    Celona L; Schettini R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Jun; 39(6):B1-B10. PubMed ID: 36215522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation.
    Jingtao Xu ; Peng Ye ; Qiaohong Li ; Haiqing Du ; Yong Liu ; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Sep; 25(9):4444-4457. PubMed ID: 27362977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images.
    Obuchowicz R; Oszust M; Piorkowski A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 32962651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Zhang W; Li D; Ma C; Zhai G; Yang X; Ma K
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Mar; 45(3):2864-2878. PubMed ID: 35635807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A deep learning-based automatic image quality assessment method for respiratory phase on computed tomography chest images.
    Su J; Li M; Lin Y; Xiong L; Yuan C; Zhou Z; Yan K
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Mar; 14(3):2240-2254. PubMed ID: 38545050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Multiscale Approach to Deep Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Liu M; Huang J; Zeng D; Ding X; Paisley J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023 Feb; PP():. PubMed ID: 37027757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning-based 3T brain MRI segmentation with guidance from 7T MRI labeling.
    Deng M; Yu R; Wang L; Shi F; Yap PT; Shen D;
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6588-6597. PubMed ID: 28054724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of Algorithmic and Visual Assessment of Lesion Detection in Clinical Images.
    Cheng Y; Smith TB; Jensen CT; Liu X; Samei E
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):847-855. PubMed ID: 31447259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind image quality assessment using joint statistics of gradient magnitude and Laplacian features.
    Xue W; Mou X; Zhang L; Bovik AC; Feng X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Nov; 23(11):4850-62. PubMed ID: 25216482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Objective Image Quality Metrics to Expert Radiologists' Scoring of Diagnostic Quality of MR Images.
    Mason A; Rioux J; Clarke SE; Costa A; Schmidt M; Keough V; Huynh T; Beyea S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Apr; 39(4):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 31535985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BM-IQE: An Image Quality Evaluator with Block-Matching for Both Real-Life Scenes and Remote Sensing Scenes.
    Xu N; Ma D; Ren G; Huang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32575567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilizing image scales towards totally training free blind image quality assessment.
    Saha A; Wu QM
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1879-92. PubMed ID: 25775489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.