These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33286664)

  • 1. Non-Markovianity of a Central Spin Interacting with a Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Bath via a Conditional Past-Future Correlation.
    Han L; Zou J; Li H; Shao B
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Aug; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33286664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global quantum discord in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model at zero and finite temperatures.
    Bao J; Liu YH; Guo B
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2021 Sep; 33(49):. PubMed ID: 34517354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analogies of the classical Euler top with a rotor to spin squeezing and quantum phase transitions in a generalized Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Opatrný T; Richterek L; Opatrný M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):1984. PubMed ID: 29386576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equivalence of critical scaling laws for many-body entanglement in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Orús R; Dusuel S; Vidal J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Jul; 101(2):025701. PubMed ID: 18764198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantum criticality of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model in terms of fidelity susceptibility.
    Kwok HM; Ning WQ; Gu SJ; Lin HQ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):032103. PubMed ID: 18851088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complexity in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Pal K; Pal K; Sarkar T
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Apr; 107(4-1):044130. PubMed ID: 37198862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing Quantum Criticality and Symmetry Breaking at the Microscopic Level.
    Makhalov V; Satoor T; Evrard A; Chalopin T; Lopes R; Nascimbene S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(12):120601. PubMed ID: 31633983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Dynamical aspects.
    Khalouf-Rivera J; Gamito J; Pérez-Bernal F; Arias JM; Pérez-Fernández P
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Jun; 107(6-1):064134. PubMed ID: 37464676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-size scaling exponents of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Dusuel S; Vidal J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2004 Dec; 93(23):237204. PubMed ID: 15601198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Irreversible processes without energy dissipation in an isolated Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Puebla R; Relaño A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(1):012101. PubMed ID: 26274119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization measures of parity adapted U(D)-spin coherent states applied to the phase space analysis of the D-level Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Mayorgas A; Guerrero J; Calixto M
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Aug; 108(2-1):024107. PubMed ID: 37723708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the dissipative Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model with proposed realization in optical cavity QED.
    Morrison S; Parkins AS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Feb; 100(4):040403. PubMed ID: 18352244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-Markovianity of qubit evolution under the action of spin environment.
    Chakraborty S; Mallick A; Mandal D; Goyal SK; Ghosh S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2987. PubMed ID: 30814544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonequilibrium Criticality in Quench Dynamics of Long-Range Spin Models.
    Titum P; Maghrebi MF
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jul; 125(4):040602. PubMed ID: 32794797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonadiabatic dynamics of the excited states for the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Kopylov W; Schaller G; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jul; 96(1-1):012153. PubMed ID: 29347272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum phase transitions in networks of Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models.
    Sorokin AV; Bastidas VM; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(4):042141. PubMed ID: 25375472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of mixed permutation symmetry sectors in the thermodynamic limit of critical three-level Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick atom models.
    Calixto M; Mayorgas A; Guerrero J
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012116. PubMed ID: 33601600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shortcut to adiabaticity in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Campbell S; De Chiara G; Paternostro M; Palma GM; Fazio R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 May; 114(17):177206. PubMed ID: 25978261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ac-Driven quantum phase transition in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model.
    Engelhardt G; Bastidas VM; Emary C; Brandes T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 May; 87(5):052110. PubMed ID: 23767490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Static aspects.
    Gamito J; Khalouf-Rivera J; Arias JM; Pérez-Fernández P; Pérez-Bernal F
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Oct; 106(4-1):044125. PubMed ID: 36397542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.