These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33286707)

  • 1. Mutual Information as a Performance Measure for Binary Predictors Characterized by Both ROC Curve and PROC Curve Analysis.
    Hughes G; Kopetzky J; McRoberts N
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Aug; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 33286707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Binormal Predictive Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for the Joint Assessment of Positive and Negative Predictive Values.
    Hughes G
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 May; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33286365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive receiver operating characteristic curve for the joint assessment of the positive and negative predictive values.
    Shiu SY; Gatsonis C
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2313-33. PubMed ID: 18407893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
    Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Carter JV; Pan J; Rai SN; Galandiuk S
    Surgery; 2016 Jun; 159(6):1638-1645. PubMed ID: 26962006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
    Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
    Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishment and Characterization of an Empirical Biomarker SS/PV-ROC Plot Using Results of the UBC
    Oehr P; Ecke T
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jun; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 33286501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.
    Robin X; Turck N; Hainard A; Tiberti N; Lisacek F; Sanchez JC; Müller M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 12():77. PubMed ID: 21414208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value.
    Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aksel G
    Turk J Emerg Med; 2023; 23(4):195-198. PubMed ID: 38024184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
    Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(21):1-111. PubMed ID: 23074399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodology of diagnostic tests in hepatology.
    Christensen E
    Ann Hepatol; 2009; 8(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19841495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of predictive modeling to receiver operating characteristics.
    Mandic S; Go C; Aggarwal I; Myers J; Froelicher VF
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev; 2008; 28(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 19008698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel method for interrogating receiver operating characteristic curves for assessing prognostic tests.
    Thomas G; Kenny LC; Baker PN; Tuytten R
    Diagn Progn Res; 2017; 1():17. PubMed ID: 31093546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification.
    Chicco D; Jurman G
    BioData Min; 2023 Feb; 16(1):4. PubMed ID: 36800973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.
    Nahm FS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2022 Feb; 75(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 35124947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.
    Greiner M; Pfeiffer D; Smith RD
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):23-41. PubMed ID: 10802332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.