These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33286842)
1. Modeling User Reputation in Online Social Networks: The Role of Costs, Benefits, and Reciprocity. Schweitzer F; Mavrodiev P; Seufert AM; Garcia D Entropy (Basel); 2020 Sep; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 33286842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the Robustness of Online Social Networks: A Simulation Approach of Network Interventions. Casiraghi G; Schweitzer F Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():57. PubMed ID: 33501225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Wedekind C; Braithwaite VA Curr Biol; 2002 Jun; 12(12):1012-5. PubMed ID: 12123575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excess reciprocity distorts reputation in online social networks. Livan G; Caccioli F; Aste T Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3551. PubMed ID: 28615619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using online social networks to track a pandemic: A systematic review. Al-Garadi MA; Khan MS; Varathan KD; Mujtaba G; Al-Kabsi AM J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():1-11. PubMed ID: 27224846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Susceptibility to social influence predicts behavior on Facebook. Stöckli S; Hofer D PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229337. PubMed ID: 32126088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stochasticity in economic losses increases the value of reputation in indirect reciprocity. dos Santos M; Placì S; Wedekind C Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():18182. PubMed ID: 26658221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trust-based access control model from sociological approach in dynamic online social network environment. Baek S; Kim S ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():936319. PubMed ID: 25374943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transfer. Suzuki S; Kimura H Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1435. PubMed ID: 23486389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmaceutical drugs chatter on Online Social Networks. Wiley MT; Jin C; Hristidis V; Esterling KM J Biomed Inform; 2014 Jun; 49():245-54. PubMed ID: 24637141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neuro-semantic prediction of user decisions to contribute content to online social networks. Cleveland P; Rios SA; Aguilera F; Graña M Neural Comput Appl; 2022; 34(19):16717-16738. PubMed ID: 35756152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Rockenbach B; Milinski M Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7120):718-23. PubMed ID: 17151660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local spatial obesity analysis and estimation using online social network sensors. Sun Q; Wang N; Li S; Zhou H J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():54-62. PubMed ID: 29551742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders. Jain L Technol Soc; 2022 Aug; 70():102048. PubMed ID: 35765463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 15363933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by social information: the role of trust and reputation in evolution of altruism. Mohtashemi M; Mui L J Theor Biol; 2003 Aug; 223(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 12875829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Links Between Users' Online Social Network Homogeneity, Ambiguity Tolerance, and Estimated Public Support for Own Opinions. Luzsa R; Mayr S Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 May; 22(5):325-329. PubMed ID: 31100022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models. Akiyama M; Abraham C Int J Med Inform; 2017 Aug; 104():1-9. PubMed ID: 28599810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internet Use for Social Interaction by People with Psychosis: A Systematic Review. Jakubowska A; Kaselionyte J; Priebe S; Giacco D Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 May; 22(5):336-343. PubMed ID: 30946609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]