These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3328790)
1. [Hemodynamic effects of a new iso-osmotic contrast medium in selective left ventriculography]. Boschat J; Gilard M; Meunier P; Etienne Y; Bellet M J Radiol; 1987 Dec; 68(12):793-7. PubMed ID: 3328790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media. Fraser AG; Culling W; Singh H; Ruttley MS; Newcombe RG Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients. Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term hemodynamic effects of diatrizoate and ioxaglate contrast media in left ventriculography. Fast JH; Uyen GJ; Heystraten FM; de Boo TM; Lemmens WA Int J Cardiol; 1985 May; 8(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3997289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of low osmolality contrast materials on coronary hemodynamics, myocardial function, and coronary sinus osmolality in normal and ischemic states. Deutsch AL; Gerber KH; Haigler FH; Higgins CB Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 7118517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Werner GS; Schmidt T; Scholz KH; Figulla HR; Kreuzer H Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Sep; 33(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 8001095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic effects of high versus low-osmolar contrast media for ventriculography in severe aortic stenosis. Lambert CR; Pepine CJ Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988; 11(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3130990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography. Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic changes after angiocardiography with a new low osmolar contrast medium (sodium-meglumin-joxaglat). Theler A; Baur HR Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1983; 9(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 6661772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography]. Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The effect of contrast ventriculography of the left ventricle on intracardiac hemodynamics in patients with ischemic heart disease]. Petrosian IuS; Aladashvili AV Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1991; (1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1887571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of contrast media on myocardial function during acute left ventricular failure in the dog. Kløw NE; Hevrøy O; Dale K; Mjøs OD Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2298549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography. Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Conray 420 for left ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. Lyons J; Brooks N; Cattell M; Isolani-Smyth E; Balcon R Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):209-11. PubMed ID: 6365233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Volume and regional contraction of the left ventricle studied with venous injection in subtraction angiography]. Rasoamanambelo L; Doriot PA; Fleisch M; Chatelain P; Noble J; Bopp P; Rutishauser W Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1985 Mar; 34(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 3890677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of ionic contrast medium on the movement of acutely ischemic and nonischemic canine myocardium. Noma S; Askenase AD; Agarwal JB; Helfant RH Am Heart J; 1988 Dec; 116(6 Pt 1):1536-41. PubMed ID: 3195438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of contrast media on left ventricular function during left coronary arteriography in dogs. Hayakawa K; Yamashita K Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 2631951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Early hemodynamic reactions of an ionic low osmolar and a nonionic contrast medium]. Wink K; Heinrich R Z Kardiol; 1984 Oct; 73(10):628-33. PubMed ID: 6516515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Hemodynamic response to opacification of the left ventricle. Comparative study of 3 contrast media with different structures]. Petitier H; Crochet D; Bizais Y; de Laguerenne J; Grossetête R; Delumeau J Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):753-7. PubMed ID: 6670836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]