These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33288231)

  • 41. Justify Your Answer: The Role of Written Think Aloud in Script Concordance Testing.
    Power A; Lemay JF; Cooke S
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27662118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods.
    Auewarakul C; Downing SM; Jaturatamrong U; Praditsuwan R
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 15733163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre-clinical medical students.
    Humbert AJ; Johnson MT; Miech E; Friedberg F; Grackin JA; Seidman PA
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 21609176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script concordance test.
    Faucher C; Dufour-Guindon MP; Lapointe G; Gagnon R; Charlin B
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 May; 99(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 27087346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.
    Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and validation of a script concordance test to assess biosciences clinical reasoning skills: A cross-sectional study of 1st year undergraduate nursing students.
    Redmond C; Jayanth A; Beresford S; Carroll L; Johnston ANB
    Nurse Educ Today; 2022 Dec; 119():105615. PubMed ID: 36334475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Construct validity of script concordance testing: progression of scores from novices to experienced clinicians.
    Wan MSH; Tor E; Hudson JN
    Int J Med Educ; 2019 Sep; 10():174-179. PubMed ID: 31562807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving the validity of script concordance testing by optimising and balancing items.
    Wan MS; Tor E; Hudson JN
    Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 52(3):336-346. PubMed ID: 29318646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Analyzing script concordance test scoring methods and items by difficulty and type.
    Wilson AB; Pike GR; Humbert AJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 24702549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Developing Script Concordance Test Items in Otolaryngology to Improve Clinical Reasoning Skills: Validation using Consensus Analysis and Psychometrics.
    Ganesan S; Bhandary S; Thulasingam M; Chacko TV; Zayapragassarazan Z; Ravichandran S; Raja K; Ramasamy K; Alexander A; Penubarthi LK
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2023; 13(2):64-69. PubMed ID: 37614842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Using the script concordance test to assess clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate and postgraduate medicine.
    Wan SH
    Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Oct; 21(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 26314569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of very short answer questions compared to multiple choice questions in undergraduate medical students: An external validation study.
    van Wijk EV; Janse RJ; Ruijter BN; Rohling JHT; van der Kraan J; Crobach S; Jonge M; Beaufort AJ; Dekker FW; Langers AMJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288558. PubMed ID: 37450485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction.
    Fournier JP; Demeester A; Charlin B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 May; 8():18. PubMed ID: 18460199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysing clinical reasoning characteristics using a combined methods approach.
    Groves M; Dick ML; McColl G; Bilszta J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Oct; 13():144. PubMed ID: 24165290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessing clinical reasoning in airway related cases among anesthesiology fellow residents using Script Concordance Test (SCT).
    Omega A; Wijaya Ramlan AA; Soenarto RF; Heriwardito A; Sugiarto A
    Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2135421. PubMed ID: 36258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dedicated teaching block for undergraduate geriatric medicine improves knowledge.
    Visvanathan R; Silakong T; Yu S
    Australas J Ageing; 2011 Dec; 30(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 22176571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pediatric Hospitalists' Performance and Perceptions of Script Concordance Testing for Self-Assessment.
    Ottolini MC; Chua I; Campbell J; Ottolini M; Goldman E
    Acad Pediatr; 2021 Mar; 21(2):252-258. PubMed ID: 33065290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.