These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33289056)

  • 21. Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.
    Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Salas RS; Galiano M; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
    BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 23889763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yang CW; Wang HH; Hassouna MF; Chand M; Huang WJS; Chung HJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14329. PubMed ID: 34253832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
    Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
    World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
    Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
    Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ginzburg S; Nevers T; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Kesler SS; Laudone VP; Wagner JR
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23318071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.
    Abdollah F; Sood A; Sammon JD; Hsu L; Beyer B; Moschini M; Gandaglia G; Rogers CG; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 26119559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
    Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
    J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrospective Cohort Analysis from a High-Volume Center of Prognostic Factors Affecting Biochemical Relapse in Patients with Encapsulated, Margin-Negative, Isolated Seminal Vesicle Invasion After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Novel Study.
    Bajpai RR; Razdan S; Sanchez-Gonzalez MA; Razdan S
    J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 31989836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.
    Rajan P; Hagman A; Sooriakumaran P; Nyberg T; Wallerstedt A; Adding C; Akre O; Carlsson S; Hosseini A; Olsson M; Egevad L; Wiklund F; Steineck G; Wiklund NP
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28753802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
    Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
    Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.