These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33289056)
41. Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study. Choi SY; Chi BH; Kim TH; Lim B; Lee W; You D; Kim CS Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 32362599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up. Bianchi L; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Larcher A; Pultrone C; Turri F; Selli C; de Groote R; de Naeyer G; Borghesi M; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Mottrie A Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 30547906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins. Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures. Paul A; Ploussard G; Nicolaiew N; Xylinas E; Gillion N; de la Taille A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Abbou CC; Salomon L Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 19775807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Somford DM; van Oort IM; Cosyns JP; Witjes JA; Kiemeney LA; Tombal B World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 21240506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years. Kim KH; Lim SK; Shin TY; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH Asian J Androl; 2013 May; 15(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 23524532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of Nerve-Sparing Status on Positive Surgical Margin Location and Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Prostate Cancer Post Radical Prostatectomy. Matsuda Y; Narita S; Okubo T; Mitsuzuka K; Hatakeyama S; Koizumi A; Koie T; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Ito A; Oyama C; Arai Y; Habuchi T Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):5341-5348. PubMed ID: 34109511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Suardi N; Ficarra V; Willemsen P; De Wil P; Gallina A; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Montorsi F; Carpentier P; Mottrie A Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 22088567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee. Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Novara G; Ficarra V; Mocellin S; Ahlering TE; Carroll PR; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Patel VR; Shariat SF; Tewari AK; Van Poppel H; Zattoni F; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Rosen RC; Wilson TG Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):382-404. PubMed ID: 22749851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer. Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Small-volume lymph node involvement and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Morizane S; Honda M; Shimizu R; Teraoka S; Nishikawa R; Tsounapi P; Kimura Y; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Takenaka A Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 25(7):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 32333202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Trends in clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy before and after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against PSA screening: a decade of experience. Seetharam Bhat KR; Moschovas MC; Onol FF; Sandri M; Rogers T; Roof S; Rocco B; Patel VR BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):884-892. PubMed ID: 32173990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy monotherapy, a more aggressive yet less invasive option, is oncologically effective in selected men with high-risk prostate cancer having only one D'Amico risk factor: experience from an Asian tertiary referral center. Tai HC; Lai MK; Huang CY; Wang SM; Huang KH; Chen CH; Chung SD; Chueh SC; Yu HJ; Pu YS J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 23987245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Level of invasion into fibromuscular band is an independent factor for positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence in men with organ confined prostate cancer. Kim A; Kim M; Jeong SU; Song C; Cho YM; Ro JY; Ahn H BMC Urol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29394928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]