230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33289339)
21. Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: a prospective clinical study.
Heberer S; Al-Chawaf B; Jablonski C; Nelson JJ; Lage H; Nelson K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 21483892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ridge preservation of compromised extraction sockets applying a soft cortical membrane: A canine proof-of-principle evaluation.
Fischer KR; Götz W; Kauffmann F; Schmidlin PR; Friedmann A
Ann Anat; 2020 Sep; 231():151524. PubMed ID: 32376298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histologic and Radiographic Analysis of Nonhealing Extraction Sockets Treated with Bio-Oss Collagen After a 4-Month Healing Period: A Prospective Descriptive Study in Humans.
Tirone F; Salzano S; Pagano M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):561–568. PubMed ID: 29513772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Healing of Bio-Oss® grafted marginal gaps at implants placed into fresh extraction sockets of incisor teeth in dogs: a study on the effect of submerged vs. non-submerged healing.
Mellati E; Chen S; Davies H; Fitzgerald W; Darby I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 25040605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral.
Lindhe J; Cecchinato D; Donati M; Tomasi C; Liljenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):786-90. PubMed ID: 23556467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test in canine extraction site preservations by using mineralized collagen plug with or without membrane.
Sun Y; Wang CY; Wang ZY; Cui Y; Qiu ZY; Song TX; Cui FZ
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Apr; 30(9):1285-99. PubMed ID: 26721867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of 3 bone substitutes in canine extraction sites.
Indovina A; Block MS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 60(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11757008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Jambhekar S; Kernen F; Bidra AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):371-82. PubMed ID: 25749077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter evaluation of extraction socket preservation comparing two bovine xenografts: clinical and histologic outcomes.
Barone A; Todisco M; Ludovichetti M; Gualini F; Aggstaller H; Torrés-Lagares D; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Kenealy JN
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(6):795-802. PubMed ID: 24116363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Histological evaluation of extraction sites grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen: Randomized controlled trial.
Keil C; Gollmer B; Zeidler-Rentzsch I; Gredes T; Heinemann F
Ann Anat; 2021 Sep; 237():151722. PubMed ID: 33771659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy of bone substitute material in preserving volume when placing a maxillary immediate complete denture: study protocol for the PANORAMIX randomized controlled trial.
Rignon-Bret C; Hadida A; Aidan A; Nguyen TH; Pasquet G; Fron-Chabouis H; Wulfman C
Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):255. PubMed ID: 27206923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using bovine xenograft compared with porcine xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Lai VJ; Michalek JE; Liu Q; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2020 Mar; 91(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 31380563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bone level change of extraction sockets with Bio-Oss collagen and implant placement: a clinical study.
Heinemann F; Hasan I; Schwahn C; Bourauel C; Mundt T
Ann Anat; 2012 Nov; 194(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 22244384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog.
Araújo M; Linder E; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19126101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone remodelling marker expression in grafted and ungrafted sheep tooth extraction sockets: A comparative randomised study.
Ram A; Duncan WJ; Coates DE; Nobakht S; Tkatchenko T; Milne TJ
Arch Oral Biol; 2023 Sep; 153():105738. PubMed ID: 37295140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. A experimental study in labrador dogs.
Carmagnola D; Berglundh T; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2002 May; 29(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 12060419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral.
Tal H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1999 Aug; 10(4):289-96. PubMed ID: 10551071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Biocompatibility and effect on bone formation of a native acellular porcine pericardium: Results of
You PY; Liu YH; Wang XZ; Wang SW; Tang L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Aug; 53(4):776-784. PubMed ID: 34393244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Deproteinized bovine bone and biodegradable barrier membranes to support healing following immediate placement of transmucosal implants: a short-term controlled clinical trial.
Cornelini R; Cangini F; Martuscelli G; Wennström J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 15626318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation and comparison of histologic changes and implant survival in extraction sites immediately grafted with two different xenografts: A randomized clinical pilot study.
Sivolella S; Botticelli D; Prasad S; Ricci S; Bressan E; Prasad H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Sep; 31(9):825-835. PubMed ID: 32559003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
