687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33290410)
1. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
Middleton P; Shepherd E; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 May; 5(5):CD004945. PubMed ID: 29741208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
Bond DM; Middleton P; Levett KM; van der Ham DP; Crowther CA; Buchanan SL; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 28257562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: A national cohort study in England.
Muller P; Karia AM; Webster K; Carroll F; Dunn G; Frémeaux A; Harris T; Knight H; Oddie S; Khalil A; Van Der Meulen J; Gurol-Urganci I
PLoS Med; 2023 Jul; 20(7):e1004259. PubMed ID: 37471395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
Gülmezoglu AM; Crowther CA; Middleton P; Heatley E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; 6(6):CD004945. PubMed ID: 22696345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.
Begley CM; Gyte GM; Devane D; McGuire W; Weeks A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD007412. PubMed ID: 25730178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delivery or expectant management for prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Bernardes TP; Zwertbroek EF; Broekhuijsen K; Koopmans C; Boers K; Owens M; Thornton J; van Pampus MG; Scherjon SA; Wallace K; Langenveld J; van den Berg PP; Franssen MTM; Mol BWJ; Groen H
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):443-453. PubMed ID: 30697855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.
Begley CM; Gyte GM; Devane D; McGuire W; Weeks A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD007412. PubMed ID: 22071837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
Buchanan SL; Crowther CA; Levett KM; Middleton P; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Mar; (3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 20238332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis.
Sotiriadis A; Petousis S; Thilaganathan B; Figueras F; Martins WP; Odibo AO; Dinas K; Hyett J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30298532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis.
Kemper JI; Li W; Goni S; Flanagan M; Weeks A; Alfirevic Z; Bracken H; Mundle S; Goonewardene M; Ten Eikelder M; Bloemenkamp K; Rengerink KO; Kruit H; Mol BW; Palmer KR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 33258514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
