BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33293256)

  • 1. Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach.
    Dirrichs T; Bauerschlag D; Maass N; Kuhl CK; Schrading S
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 33293256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
    Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
    Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving risk stratification of indeterminate adnexal masses on MRI: What imaging features help predict malignancy in O-RADS MRI 4 lesions?
    Wong BZY; Causa Andrieu PI; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki EM; Vargas HA; Woo S
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111122. PubMed ID: 37806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical evaluation of the specificity of MRI and TVUS for differentiation of malignant from benign adnexal lesions.
    Reuter M; Steffens J; Schüppler U; Lüttges J; Muhle C; Brinkmann G; Maschek A; Weisner D; Spielmann R; Heller M
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9442126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of 3T MRI findings for primary adnexal lesions and comparison with the final histological diagnosis.
    Zhang H; Zhang GF; He ZY; Li ZY; Zhang GX
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 289(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 23934242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
    Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
    Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Poncelet E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Guerra A; Fournier LS; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Bharwani N; Juhan V; Cunha TM; Masselli G; Balleyguier C; Malhaire C; Perrot NF; Sadowski EA; Bazot M; Taourel P; Porcher R; Darai E; Reinhold C; Rockall AG
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jan; 3(1):e1919896. PubMed ID: 31977064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative laparoscopic sonography for improved preoperative sonographic pathologic characterization of adnexal masses.
    Yang WT; Yuen PM; Ho SS; Leung TN; Metreweli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 1998 Jan; 17(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9440109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses.
    Marro A; Allen LM; Kives SL; Moineddin R; Chavhan GB
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Aug; 46(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 27097921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.