479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33293284)
1. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.
Marnitz S; Tsunoda AT; Martus P; Vieira M; Affonso Junior RJ; Nunes J; Budach V; Hertel H; Mustea A; Sehouli J; Scharf JP; Ulrich U; Ebert A; Piwonski I; Kohler C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1855-1861. PubMed ID: 33293284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Surgical Versus Clinical Staging in Chemoradiated FIGO Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer Patients-Acute Toxicity and Treatment Quality of the Uterus-11 Multicenter Phase III Intergroup Trial of the German Radiation Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Cancer Group.
Marnitz S; Martus P; Köhler C; Stromberger C; Asse E; Mallmann P; Schmidberger H; Affonso Júnior RJ; Nunes JS; Sehouli J; Budach V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Feb; 94(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 26853333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008217. PubMed ID: 23543561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of Histologically Proven Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases and Rate of Upstaging in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Tsunoda AT; Marnitz S; Soares Nunes J; Mattos de Cunha Andrade CE; Scapulatempo Neto C; Blohmer JU; Herrmann J; Kerr LM; Martus P; Schneider A; Favero G; Köhler C
Oncology; 2017; 92(4):213-220. PubMed ID: 28142146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Apr; (4):CD008217. PubMed ID: 21491407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging.
Gouy S; Morice P; Narducci F; Uzan C; Martinez A; Rey A; Bentivegna E; Pautier P; Deandreis D; Querleu D; Haie-Meder C; Leblanc E
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 31(24):3026-33. PubMed ID: 23857967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PARa-aOrtic LymphAdenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer (PAROLA trial): a GINECO, ENGOT, and GCIG study.
Martinez A; Lecuru F; Bizzarri N; Chargari C; Ducassou A; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Cibula D; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil Moreno A; Angeles MA; Muallem MZ; Kohler C; Luyckx M; Kridelka F; Rychlik A; Gerestein KG; Heinzelmann V; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Ferron G; Betrian S; Filleron T; Fotopoulou C; Querleu D;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Feb; 33(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 36717163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False negative rate at
Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prognostic value of FIGO staging defined by combining MRI and [
Raffa S; Lanfranchi F; Satragno C; Giannelli F; Marcenaro M; Coco A; Cena SE; Sofia L; Marini C; Mammoliti S; Levaggi A; Tagliafico AS; Sambuceti G; Barra S; Morbelli S; Belgioia L; Bauckneht M
Curr Probl Cancer; 2023 Dec; 47(6):101007. PubMed ID: 37684197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; Querleu D; Gil-Moreno A; Morice P; Jhingran A; Munsell MF; Macapinlac HA; Leblanc E; Martinez A; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 23911560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extended field chemoradiation for cervical cancer patients with histologically proven para-aortic lymph node metastases after laparaoscopic lymphadenectomy.
Marnitz S; Schram J; Budach V; Sackerer I; Vercellino GF; Sehouli J; Köhler C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 May; 191(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25413986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
