BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33295211)

  • 1. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
    Fujita A; Ryozawa S; Tanisaka Y; Ogawa T; Suzuki M; Katsuda H; Tashima T; Araki R; Mizuide M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Ishigaki K; Nakai Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Nakamura T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Hamada T; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Tada M; Isayama H; Koike K
    Gut Liver; 2020 Nov; 14(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 32457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
    Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does ProCore Fine-Needle Biopsy Really Improve the Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of Pancreatic Masses?
    Delconte G; Cavalcoli F; Magarotto A; Centonze G; Bezzio C; Cattaneo L; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Bonitta G; Milione M; Enzo M
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 33780932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
    Takagi T; Sugimoto M; Imamura H; Takahata Y; Nakajima Y; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Irie H; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Hashimoto Y; Shibukawa G; Marubashi S; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    Clin Endosc; 2023 Jan; 56(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 36646425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions.
    Sugimoto M; Irie H; Takagi T; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Kobayashi Y; Hashimoto Y; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1094. PubMed ID: 33176750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.