These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33295217)
1. Refractive outcomes of high-magnitude astigmatism correction using femtosecond LASIK versus transepithelial PRK. Reitblat O; Gershoni A; Mimouni M; Vainer I; Livny E; Nahum Y; Segev F; Bahar I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2923-2931. PubMed ID: 33295217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) yields better results than transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (Trans-PRK) for correction of low to moderate grade myopia. Gershoni A; Reitblat O; Mimouni M; Livny E; Nahum Y; Bahar I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2914-2922. PubMed ID: 33307790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 200 Hz flying-spot technology of the LaserSight LSX excimer laser in the treatment of myopic astigmatism: six and 12 month outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Stojanovic A; Nitter TA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Aug; 27(8):1263-77. PubMed ID: 11524200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LASIK versus photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic (> 3 diopter) astigmatism. Katz T; Wagenfeld L; Galambos P; Darrelmann BG; Richard G; Linke SJ J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):824-31. PubMed ID: 24202704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism. Mimouni M; Pokroy R; Rabina G; Kaiserman I Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2091-2098. PubMed ID: 33751303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Z-LASIK and Trans-PRK for correction of high-grade myopia: safety, efficacy, predictability and clinical outcomes. Gershoni A; Mimouni M; Livny E; Bahar I Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 39(4):753-763. PubMed ID: 29532217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis. Luger MH; Ewering T; Arba-Mosquera S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 27956284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vector analysis of astigmatism correction after PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE for myopic astigmatism. Hashemi H; Asgari S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari Z Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):3999-4009. PubMed ID: 37405568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus photorefractive keratectomy in the correction of myopic astigmatism. Fraunfelder FW; Wilson SE Cornea; 2001 May; 20(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 11333325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia. Van Gelder RN; Steger-May K; Yang SH; Rattanatam T; Pepose JS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Mar; 28(3):462-76. PubMed ID: 11973093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for the treatment of compound hyperopic astigmatism. El-Agha MS; Bowman RW; Cavanagh D; McCulley JP J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 May; 29(5):900-7. PubMed ID: 12781273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of hyperopic ablations using alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK: comparative study. Asroui L; Arba-Mosquera S; Torbey J; Ahmed MA; Fattah MA; Koaik M; Awwad ST J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jul; 49(7):716-723. PubMed ID: 36913543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Astigmatic changes after excimer laser refractive surgery. Yang SH; Van Gelder RN; Pepose JS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Mar; 28(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 11973094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. Wen D; McAlinden C; Flitcroft I; Tu R; Wang Q; AliĆ³ J; Marshall J; Huang Y; Song B; Hu L; Zhao Y; Zhu S; Gao R; Bao F; Yu A; Yu Y; Lian H; Huang J Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():65-78. PubMed ID: 28336402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized bilateral comparison of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for 2.50 to 8.00 diopters of myopia. El-Maghraby A; Salah T; Waring GO; Klyce S; Ibrahim O Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 10080199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: a control-matched study. Pop M; Payette Y Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 10690820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The safety and efficacy of photorefractive keratectomy after laser in situ keratomileusis. Shaikh NM; Wee CE; Kaufman SC J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 16128332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Han T; Shang J; Zhou X; Xu Y; Ang M; Zhou X J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Mar; 46(3):419-427. PubMed ID: 32142040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF; Hersh PS Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgically induced astigmatism after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Hersh PS; Abbassi R J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Mar; 25(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 10079445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]