These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33295802)

  • 1. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the
    Eghtedari M; Chong A; Rakow-Penner R; Ojeda-Fournier H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging Phenotypes in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer on Mammography, Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Fifth Edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
    Marino MA; Riedl CC; Bernathova M; Bernhart C; Baltzer PAT; Helbich TH; Pinker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():150-159. PubMed ID: 30150038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
    Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of Breast MRI Utilizing the BI-RADS Fifth Edition Lexicon: How Are We Doing and Where Are We Headed?
    Shin K; Phalak K; Hamame A; Whitman GJ
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017; 46(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 26826797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRI in the Assessment of BI-RADS® 4 lesions.
    Leithner D; Wengert G; Helbich T; Morris E; Pinker K
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 26(5):191-199. PubMed ID: 28961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening.
    Vinnicombe S
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 Jul; 16(1):17. PubMed ID: 27456031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management.
    Raza S; Goldkamp AL; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213. PubMed ID: 20833845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Edwards SD; Lipson JA; Ikeda DM; Lee JM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 23928239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BI-RADS Category Assignments by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google Bard: A Multilanguage Study.
    Cozzi A; Pinker K; Hidber A; Zhang T; Bonomo L; Lo Gullo R; Christianson B; Curti M; Rizzo S; Del Grande F; Mann RM; Schiaffino S
    Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e232133. PubMed ID: 38687216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS): Advantages and Limitations].
    Choi JS
    J Korean Soc Radiol; 2023 Jan; 84(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 36818717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic classification and prioritisation of actionable BI-RADS categories using natural language processing models.
    López-Úbeda P; Martín-Noguerol T; Luna A
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Jan; 79(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 37838546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.
    Zhang XL; Guan J; Li MZ; Liu MJ; Guo Y; Zheng YL; Yang Z; Yang JY
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 27162117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).
    Liberman L; Menell JH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):409-30, v. PubMed ID: 12117184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
    Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.