153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33295807)
1. Barriers to post-placental intrauterine device receipt among expectant minority women.
Furman L; Pettit S; Balthazar MS; Williams K; O'Riordan MA
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Apr; 26(2):91-97. PubMed ID: 33295807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying barriers to post-placental intrauterine device placement: male partners' views.
Yates M; Styles D; Janes J; DeLozier S; Furman L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Apr; 25(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 32162558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Expectant inner-city women: attitudes about contraception given infant feeding choice.
Fuell Wysong E; Tossone K; Furman L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Oct; 22(5):369-374. PubMed ID: 29131703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "I don't know enough to feel comfortable using them:" Women's knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus.
Hall KS; Ela E; Zochowski MK; Caldwell A; Moniz M; McAndrew L; Steel M; Challa S; Dalton VK; Ernst S
Contraception; 2016 Jun; 93(6):556-64. PubMed ID: 26879627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associations Between Prenatal Intention and Postpartum Choice: Infant Feeding and Contraception Decisions Among Inner-City Women.
Johnson NA; Fuell Wysong E; Tossone K; Furman L
Breastfeed Med; 2019 Sep; 14(7):456-464. PubMed ID: 31166698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
Paul R; Huysman BC; Maddipati R; Madden T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. PubMed ID: 31838124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States.
Xu X; Macaluso M; Frost J; Anderson JE; Curtis K; Grosse SD
Fertil Steril; 2011 Nov; 96(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 21917255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the post-abortion period among women seeking abortion in mainland China: intentions and barriers.
Luo Z; Gao L; Anguzu R; Zhao J
Reprod Health; 2018 May; 15(1):85. PubMed ID: 29793501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do Expectant Mothers' Breastfeeding Plans Influence Provider Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling?
Furman L; Shaker M; Arora KS
J Hum Lact; 2020 Nov; 36(4):808-815. PubMed ID: 31513458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.
Judge-Golden CP; Wiesenfeld HC; Chen BA; Borrero S
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Dec; 29(12):1586-1595. PubMed ID: 32667847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion vs puerperal insertion in women undergoing caesarean delivery in Egypt: a 1 year randomised controlled trial.
Bayoumi YA; Dakhly DMR; Bassiouny YA; Gouda HM; Hassan MA; Hassan AA
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Dec; 25(6):439-444. PubMed ID: 33006501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraceptive method use among HIV-positive women in a US urban outpatient clinic: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
Tote KM; Raziano VT; Wall KM; Cordes S; Ofotokun I; Haddad LB
Contraception; 2018 Dec; 98(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 30075117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expanding Access to the Intrauterine Device in Public Health Facilities in Ethiopia: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Tilahun Y; Mehta S; Zerihun H; Lew C; Brooks MI; Nigatu T; Hagos KL; Asnake M; Tasissa A; Ali S; Desalegn K; Adane G
Glob Health Sci Pract; 2016 Mar; 4(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 27016541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Knowledge, Training, and Provider Concerns Predict Referrals and Placement.
Thompson CM; Broecker J; Dade M
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2019 Nov; 119(11):725-734. PubMed ID: 31657827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Young men's awareness and knowledge of intrauterine devices in the United States.
Marshall CJ; Gomez AM
Contraception; 2015 Nov; 92(5):494-500. PubMed ID: 26169342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion.
Armstrong MA; Raine-Bennett T; Reed SD; Gatz J; Getahun D; Schoendorf J; Postlethwaite D; Fassett MJ; Peipert JF; Saltus CW; Merchant M; Alabaster A; Zhou X; Ichikawa L; Shi JM; Chiu VY; Xie F; Hunter S; Wang J; Ritchey ME; Chillemi G; Im TM; Takhar HS; Pisa F; Asiimwe A; Anthony MS
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Feb; 5(2):e2148474. PubMed ID: 35226086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motivations for Interest, Disinterest and Uncertainty in Intrauterine Device Use Among Young Women.
Gomez AM; Freihart B
Matern Child Health J; 2017 Sep; 21(9):1753-1762. PubMed ID: 28631146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
