BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33296066)

  • 1. Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.
    Merlo G; van Driel M; Hall L
    Health Econ Rev; 2020 Dec; 10(1):39. PubMed ID: 33296066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
    Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
    Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attribute Development in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Methods and Techniques to Inform Quantitative Instruments.
    Bohorquez NG; Malatzky C; McPhail SM; Mitchell R; Lim MHA; Kularatna S
    Value Health; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Bien DR; Danner M; Vennedey V; Civello D; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
    Patient; 2017 Oct; 10(5):553-565. PubMed ID: 28364387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.
    Collacott H; Soekhai V; Thomas C; Brooks A; Brookes E; Lo R; Mulnick S; Heidenreich S
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):775-790. PubMed ID: 33950476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.
    Choudhary D; Thomas M; Pacheco-Barrios K; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann H; Hazlewood G
    Patient; 2022 Nov; 15(6):629-639. PubMed ID: 35829927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.
    Trapero-Bertran M; Rodríguez-Martín B; López-Bastida J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219905. PubMed ID: 31318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.
    Soekhai V; de Bekker-Grob EW; Ellis AR; Vass CM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Feb; 37(2):201-226. PubMed ID: 30392040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies.
    Al-Aqeel S; Alotaiwi R; Albugami B
    Health Econ Rev; 2023 Mar; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 36933108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
    Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.